YoSoyLalo
me reading HF
“Lundqvist "We still believe that we can do it. We have to start by just focusing on the first period tomorrow."
“@stevezipay: Lundqvist said he needs to "give up one or less" in Game 4â€
Yes, yes he does.
“Lundqvist "We still believe that we can do it. We have to start by just focusing on the first period tomorrow."
“@stevezipay: Lundqvist said he needs to "give up one or less" in Game 4â€
wat.He said I need to give up one or less but he wasn't saying thats what he needs to do
if henrik goes into god mode we have a chance. the problem is, he's actually been pretty damn close to god mode this series. tough to blame him for any of the goals.
Yes, but with a little luck a lot of those pucks hit him.if henrik goes into god mode we have a chance. the problem is, he's actually been pretty damn close to god mode this series. tough to blame him for any of the goals.
Yes, but with a little luck a lot of those pucks hit him.
He's stopped 89.2% of all shots on him and none of them were gimmes. There's certainly upward potential.
You can boil the series down to Kreiders post in the OT of game two.
Nash makes the strong move to the net. Kreider sends it off the post.
Could have been a different series right there.
But my point is that it should NEVER have come to that. You can't keep going to that well and expect to keep drawing cool, sweet water.
The Rangers had it 2 - 0, 3 -1 then 4 - 2. They blew it plain and simple.
Searing indictment of AV.
How are a couple of post game comments after the team goes down 3 to 0 in the scf a searing indictment of the coach. This place is unbelievable.
This is what I think people aren't getting. Henrik hasn't played THAT badly at all.
So your argument is the Kings make his save percentage worse? Don't think I've heard that one yet.
He's been slightly above league average since he entered the league.
wat.
Jonathan Quick is one of the top 5 goalies in the NHL. It's not to be debated.
You can use all the statistics you want. My earlier post talking and showing video about his technical skills go further into depth about it.
Hank is better, but someone earlier called him an overrated, average goalie. Basically someone who has zero idea about any technical aspects of what makes a goaltender elite.
So a goalie who uses superior technical skills to produce mediocre results is elite?Jonathan Quick is one of the top 5 goalies in the NHL. It's not to be debated.
You can use all the statistics you want. My earlier post talking and showing video about his technical skills go further into depth about it.
Hank is better, but someone earlier called him an overrated, average goalie. Basically someone who has zero idea about any technical aspects of what makes a goaltender elite.
So a goalie who uses superior technical skills to produce mediocre results is elite?
So a goalie who uses superior technical skills to produce mediocre results is elite?
Thomas twice posted more than 40 saves above league average in a season.I think Quick gets a bit of the Tim Thomas effect where the fact that his positioning and aggressiveness force him to make acrobatic saves causes people to overrate him. In reality, many of those acrobatic saves would be unnecessary for a more conservative goalie with better puck tracking and positioning.
Quick is a very good goalie, but he definitely gets more credit than he deserves.
Thomas twice posted more than 40 saves above league average in a season.
Quick is 27 saves above average over his career.
Quick is a very good goalie, but he definitely gets more credit than he deserves.