I would have been happy with 6-4 with Clarkson and the rest of them out of the line up. Now I want 8-2
.
It's certainly doable.
Our next 4 games are..Minny, Carolina, Chicago, and Anaheim. Assume that Chicago is a guaranteed loss, and I still feel comfortable that we can take 2/3 against the other teams.
Out of those - I think the "must win" is going to be against Carolina (simply for the wild-card factor).
Wouldn't it be something if this team beat Chicago? (we'd have to be firing on all thrusters for that to happen). but i honestly think that would say A LOT about the team should do do that. I think (just by watching the Anaheim/Ottawa game.... I really wish I had money to keep Centre Ice). we could beat the Ducks - we'd just have to play OUR game.
Ideally - I'd like a
minimum a point against
regulation win against
a point against the
and regulation win against the
I think if we're still playing out line up and playing
better that's doable. the mind of this team is "we can always come back." so it wouldn't shock me if we could win (regardless) vs. Chicago or Minny.
at the end of the day if we can .500 it - that's making me a happy panda.
(lol I want a strangle hold on the top of the division darnit!)
Leafs have used FIVE rookies this season, yes FIVE! And are doing all this without Clarkson. This team finally has depth.
Can't understand why people are saying the Leafs d is bad??? They have been giving up just over 2 goals per game, which is decent. They give up a lot of shots, but most are from the outside. This team can sure score though. I can't wait until their gritty guys return. Clarkson, Kulemin, McLaren and Fraser will add more scoring and sandpaper to the lineup.
I think some people (and i'm going to lump the media in with this) is confusing the bad "D" with the defense-pairings with the overall defensive play of the team.
some of the guys have been horrendous. (it cycles back between Ranger and Franson), but I think if you just look at it with common sense, it's to be expected. Franson missed all but 2 days of training camp, so i think we're seeing the "rush" come off, and the rust is starting to show. I'm not too worried about him - he should be okay by next week or so - and I loved his comment that pretty much he needs to be better for Rielly.
Ranger is in the same boat - sure he had training camp but he's not played with NHL stars in 4 years. (the games totally different now, you'd have to imagine). but something that a lot of people aren't giving him credit for is that he's getting better each game. he's reading the play well etc. (It kind of sucks that he only had an AHL contract last year, because it would have really behooved him to get in some games last year during the end of the season).
but the defensive play of the team is sorely lacking, and I think it IS due to the fact we're dressing five rookies. we're not cycling as well, we're not hitting as hard, we're not doing the little things that made us a beast to play against. so once that tightens up we'll be fine. and maybe htat doesn't happen until at least Clarkson comes back. and he can lead that rush - and then as they say, down the line with all the other returning players.