It doesn't look good from a hockey perspective either. We give up WAY too many scoring and high scoring chances to be successful. It's not a coincidence we are last in goals against.
I didn't say i like the style the coaching has got them playing, or that they have a good defensive structure or that they are efficient at preventing goals against.
I agree that this team needs to be a lot tighter defensively but you have to understand this :
Shots Against Per 60 : 30th
Scoring Chances Against Per 60 : 27th
High Danger Scoring Chances Against Per 60 : 21st
What does it tell you?
Does the shots chart track rebound chances? It could also be that Anderson stops initial quality shots and we aren't clearing rebounds.
I think our system is to allow perimeter shots but prevent second chances. I don't find that we give up many of those, compared to some other teams. Problem with this system is the "breaches", whenever a player is not in the right position or leaves his man go, which unfortunately happens too often.
shots are tracked somewhere in terms of low, medium and high scoring chance. Using it suggests that Anderson has been merely average for us
Ya, I demonstrated it twice using those numbers
It's not that Andy is bad goalie, he's just not the super human a part of this fanbase seem to think and the only reason with Karlsson that we are not a "lottery team". In fact, advanced stats suggest that Karlsson has a big impact on the number of goals against and that Andy is not playing at a savior level.