sawchuk1971
Registered User
- Jun 16, 2011
- 1,494
- 509
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/sp...-clique-too-soft-on-themselves-234867221.html
continued..
The current leadership group has allowed itself to stagnate. To hover around .500 and to accept mediocrity. We've seen it this week, with the Jets supplying a superior effort in a win over the New York Rangers and then playing soft, uninspired hockey in a loss to the dreadful Florida Panthers.
They know they are better than their record but they're unwilling to push one another to the next level. They're a comfortable little club and they're going nowhere.
Effective leaders don't stand idle when their peers are inconsistent.
Players can demand more from one another in the most effective of ways. In three years we have not seen this from the Winnipeg Jets core leadership group.
Guys like Olli Jokinen and Mark Stuart know the right way and it's great when they voice their opinion, but if there's to be change, it must come from higher up.
There is a hierarchy in the Jets dressing room and at the top is a group of players who bonded together in Atlanta. Those friendships are taking precedence over results and they are rotting away any chance of success for the Jets.
Andrew Ladd, Blake Wheeler, Bryan Little, Toby Enstrom and Dustin Byfuglien. All talented, all well-paid and secure. And all at the top of an underachieving team.
continued..
About five years ago, the Toronto Maple Leafs had "The Muskoka 5," a group of players that held their inner sanctum's interests above those of the team. That group was comprised of five key players: captain Matts Sundin, Darcy Tucker, Bryan McCabe, Thomas Kaberle and Pavel Kubina. "Muskoka 5" implied these players were comfortable merely playing out the season and spending the summers in lake country.
Here in Winnipeg, we have the Atlanta Association. A clubby set where calling one another out is forbidden.
Don't tell me Ladd can't see the difference in the work ethic and will to win between this group and those he won Stanley Cups with in Carolina and Chicago. Ladd is both perceptive and a player, who for the most part, personifies the characteristics required to win.
He works hard at practice, goes to the tough areas on the ice and is willing to put his body into the action. Maybe he has his off nights, but if the Jets had 10 Andrew Ladds they'd be a playoff team.
And I don't think Ladd is a bad captain. But I have to question whether he's the right man for this situation.
Ladd isn't the problem. But he hasn't been able to effect a solution. Given a couple of veterans who could demand respect in the room and push for change, Ladd might succeed.
But his support group isn't helping him. They don't have the personalities for it and it's not going to change.
Good people? Sure. But leaders? The type to stand up and tell his best friend he's not getting it done? Nope.