I implied he needed a change, and a change is what he has now given us. Rather than his usual family dramas, he has tackled the mystery genre. You could have knocked me over with a feather when I heard the news. His directing a genre movie is a little like renting a Lamborghini to go and buy groceries. He is a lot more director than a murder mystery needs. Or so I thought. What he has come up with here is one of the best movies of his very distinguished career. Within ten seconds of the The Third Murder's beginning, we know who the murderer is. The mystery involves why he did it. Shigemori (Masaharu Fukuyama), a hot-shot defense lawyer, is procured to handle the case, but his client Misumi (Koji Yakusho) is a frustrating one. He gives Shigemori very little information and what does slip out seems unreliable. Further, Misumi doesn't really care--one of the lawyers calls him "an empty vessel." Shigemori keeps digging, uncovers a number of plausible possibilities, and discovers that the destiny of a young girl might or might not be involved. However, he can never pin down Misumi's motives. The closer Shigemori gets to the truth, the more it evaporates before his very eyes. The best scenes in The Third Murder occur between lawyer and accused as they spar back and forth. Oddly these scenes have a hushed quality that somehow only increases their intensity. Both Fukuyama and Yakusho are great here. Shigemori use of the word "but" and of the word "why" tries to get at all of the questions that I wanted him to ask, and yet he still can't get a handle on what actually did happen. The Third Murder becomes an exploration of the very nature of truth, a Rashomon for the 21st century, and it is absolutely riveting to watch unfold. I don't remember a mystery that I have enjoyed so much in years, maybe not since Bong Joon-ho's Mother in 2009. For this movie, you do need the Lamborghini.Waiting for the movie [After the Storm] to start, I was wondering when Koreeda would reach his limit with these tales of family turmoil that he does so exceedingly well. Would there come a saturation point where the material just became too familiar and repetitive?
Manhunt (2017) Directed by John Woo 3A
John Woo is back to making action movies, but I kind of wish he wasn't. Manhunt is awful. The plot could not be more hackneyed if it tried. It involves a nasty pharmaceutical company, a totally unnecessary attempt to eliminate a former employee, and stock mayhem of no consequence whatsoever. Half way through, my mind wandering, I tried to think of a worse Roger Moore Bond movie because this script would have been tired and dated by 1975. I couldn't think of one and I don't like Roger Moore Bond movies. For some reason, Manhunt is in English almost half of the time, probably because we have a Japanese cop and Chinese lawyer as our two erstwhile heroes. Masahuru Fukuyama, the cop, is particularly bad because he sounds like he has memorized his lines phonetically and has no idea where the stresses should go. The odd thing is that I saw him just a few hours earlier give maybe the best performances of the year by a male actor in Hirokazu Koreeda's wonderful The Third Murder. Just goes to show both ways, what an impact a script and a director can have on a performance. Even action movie addicts might want to give this one a miss.
half subtitles/half English
L'Avventura (1960) - 5/10
A slightly similar premise to About Elly where a young woman disappears on holiday but utterly boring and without any of the drama in the second half, or the first half. Italian cinema from the 50s-60s seems supremely overrated based on everything I've seen, Bicycle Thieves was great but it was from 1948.
L'Avventura (1960) - 5/10
A slightly similar premise to About Elly where a young woman disappears on holiday but utterly boring and without any of the drama in the second half, or the first half. Italian cinema from the 50s-60s seems supremely overrated based on everything I've seen, Bicycle Thieves was great but it was from 1948.
I'd include Antonioni, too, who I find anything but boring, although I don't think he would have ever gotten to where he landed without the foundation of neo-realism. I always thought he turned that movement on its ear--instead of making movies about the external cares of working class people, he made movies about the internal dynamics of privileged people. I also think that a lot of small, personal movies would never have existed had not neo-realism also broken the ground for that kind of movie. There are probably a lot of directors working today who don't even realize that they owe a great debt to Italian neo-realism.The 50s is one of the most interesting periods of Italian cinema. Even though neorealism continues to be the leading movement, as directors like Rossellini and De Sica, were still at the height of their creative prowess and continue to make make good works, its impact had started to wane, with the rise of the Italian economy and everyday income. Suddenly, people no longer wanted to look at the hardships of life, and as a result, other movements started to emerge, such as Italian comedies. Even neorealism began to splinter, as Visconti began to move into grandiose epics, and Fellini, in particular, started to develop his own style.