It most likely starts with Chabot+17 1st+.
Unless they're willing to settle for Englund or Jaros, pass.
It most likely starts with Chabot+17 1st+.
Unless they're willing to settle for Englund or Jaros, pass.
Why would the Sens make that trade?
They shouldn't. But if they wanted landeskog it would realistically take something similar to that in return.
They shouldn't. But if they wanted landeskog it would realistically take something similar to that in return.
i'd do it, but depends on the picks. mid round? sure late round? sure 1sts maybeLandeskog for Ceci and dzingel plus picks ?
Two bluechipers? Hardly. 1 and a pick. I can't even recall a trade like this in recent memory
i'd do it, but depends on the picks. mid round? sure late round? sure 1sts maybe
Sens fans: Is Lazar salvageable?
Honestly I think Ceci+1st would be good enough to get Landeskog. Cecil is young and despite the fact that he hasn't played like a top pairing D-man he should be good enough to get Landeskog with a 1st. I don't think the Sens want to part with Chabot, but it might take him.
Lazar has been playing well but will probably top of as a good 3rd line center.
Sens fans: Is Lazar salvageable?
Not even close.
Ceci is a 5th defender and a mid/late 1st rounder is next to nothing.