Which group was better?
Context:
Refer to Henry's comments about England at one point having the best midfield in the world.
Context:
Refer to Henry's comments about England at one point having the best midfield in the world.
No contest to me.
And among attacking midfielders were guys like Ribery. Already a better option than any England had.
Talent wise it's probably very close. The composition is no contest though. Gerrard, Scholes, Lampard and Beckham just don't work all that well together.
Scholes and Beckham did but they would have needed Giggs and Keane to really make it work.
Talentwise it's very close?
No
Zidane, Vieira and Makelele are all better than every English player listed. No contest.
Presumably Malouda wandered into the thread by accident.