Boston Globe KPD: How the Bruins stack up so far with the NHL standard-bearers: the 1976-77 Canadiens

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
69,096
100,230
Cambridge, MA
Too good to be true, right? The Bruins, atop the NHL standings with their mesmerizing 32-4-4 record, return to work Thursday night against the Kraken on Causeway Street.

No way Jim Montgomery’s merry marauders can keep banking points at an .850 clip. Right?

Maybe it’s time we stop thinking something’s gotta give here. If there is some fatal flaw in the Black-and-Gold chemistry, or something that will render them ordinary in the second half of the 82-game schedule, it has yet to surface. That’s especially true on Garden ice, where the Bruins are 19-0-3 (this is not a typo).

Three months into the strongest 40-game opening in the post-WW2 NHL, the Bruins are on pace to finish with 139 points, a full touchdown better than the 132 posted by the powerhouse 1976-77 Canadiens. That 132 figure, chalked up in an 80-game season, remains the NHL goal standard.

Time now for a few comparisons between today’s Bruins and the ‘76-77 iteration of Les Glorieux, who finished with an .825 points percentage. Keep in mind, the Habs that season went 29-5-6/64 points (.800) in their opening 40.


Full article attached

▪ Pasta and the Flower (David Pastrnak and Guy Lafleur).

▪ Linus Ullmark and Ken Dryden.

▪ The Montreal defense was led by Serge Savard, Guy Lapointe, and Larry Robinson.

▪ Scotty Bowman led those Habs to the Stanley Cup for his third time, and followed with Nos. 4 and 5 in ‘78 and ‘79. His team erased Don Cherry’s Bruins along the way in each of those three years, including a 4-0 sweep in ‘77.
 

Attachments

  • 1977.pdf
    1.5 MB · Views: 2

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
69,096
100,230
Cambridge, MA

JINX !

I'm just the messenger

When that Habs team was blown out by the Bruins fans wanted Bowman fired

1673380398664.png


Their next loss came in March
 

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
69,096
100,230
Cambridge, MA
Montreal in the 1976-1977 season may have been the greatest NHL team ever. The league was still 2 years away from the WHA expansion which did water down the league.

In that era, Montreal and the Soviet Red Army team were the best.



But the fact we even compare today's Bruins to that Montreal team speaks volumes.
 

smithformeragent

Moderator
Sep 22, 2005
33,459
26,248
Milford, NH
Yeah, this season has been great and all, but I’m not going down this path.

Different eras.

They’re running away with the Presidents’ Trophy, but that doesn’t necessarily equate to playoff success.

I come back to that 2008-09 team that steamrolled their way through the regular season only to get stunned by the Canes in round 2.

Talented team. Scored a ton of goals. Fun team to watch.

Playoffs are a grind though.

They had the makings of a Cup winning team obviously because that same core won it two years later, but nothing is guaranteed.

And there’s going to be a ton of pressure on this team come April, knowing it’s the last kick at the can for reals this time.

They’ve got a great shot, but they can only prove so much during the Fall and Winter months.
 

missingchicklet

Registered User
Jan 24, 2010
36,589
34,464
Completely different era in a league with a lot fewer teams and less parity. And most importantly -- f*** the Habs!!!!
 

BlackFrancis

Athletic Supporter Patch Partner
Dec 14, 2013
5,747
9,173
'77 Habs were death on ice. I brought them up as a sobering comparison differential-wise back in one of the game threads, I think.

The remnants of that bunch were the team the Bruins beat their skulls against for a decade until Neely and Lemelin finally broke through. Lafleur and Tremblay were gone while Robinson and Carbonneau were greybeards, but at least a couple of the bastards were still there to drive the stake into them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dennis Bonvie

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad