Again what does Miller change? We still need to draft a bunch of dmen. We still need to build our basically entire defense. We still need multiple top pair D.
So we get Miller and add him to a team that is probably the worst in the NHL history or at least has a solid argument and expect him to just be okay with it. We move 3 pieces that could be used later to add to our young core like the Kings did with Dubois, Danault, Gavrikov, Fiala, etc.
It’s like adding a luxury pool to the house before the foundation is even poured.
Yeah. This was pretty much my initial reaction to the original post's assertion that, "K'Andre Miller is exactly what the Sharks need". Like, sure...he'd be nice to add, but don't the Sharks need...
literally everything? They're still very early in this whole rebuilding process. It just doesn't make sense to start adding slightly older players at a premium acquisition cost at this point.
Realistically, i think a K'Andre trade would probably have to start with Mukhamadullin, under the premise that he'd be stepping right in for the Rangers in Millers spot next year. That's the only way i see the Rangers "downgrading" a Top-4D in the middle of a competitive cycle. At which point, i don't really see how that helps San Jose or gets them anywhere...when they could just wait on the younger guy themselves and see how he pans out.
As for the luxury pool though, i think you probably want to pour that with, or as part of the foundation. So if that's how we're team-building, i guess maybe they
should trade for someone like Miller.
But probably not in this case.