I'm really liking the Danielson pick more and more as time goes on.
Feels like people overthought the production. He's a good skater, with good hands, hockey IQ, effort level (when not literally doing everything for his team). Plus I'm much more convinced he's an NHL C than Dvorsky so I see why we opted for Danielson over him and the likes of Benson, Wood, etc.
It's always a good question, which one is better player:
A) player who scores 4.00 points/60min and is scored 3.50 points/60min against
B) player who scores 3.00 points/60min and is scored 2.00 points/60min against
Player A is better individual scorer and will impact +0.5 goal difference every night.
Player B scores less as an individual and will create +1.0 goal difference every night.
Player A will get higher salaries at NHL, because 90% of contracts are based on production.
Player B impacts more on winning.
Which one would you like?