So the first ever bachelor party without alcohol involved or the person starting the fire was the only one not drinking? I'm guessing neither and that's flat out untrue, but I honestly don't care either way because **** happens. I can understand why you might want to say booze wasn't involved because it sounds worse when it is but come on, are you kidding me? A bunch of young hockey players in the woods for a party and no alcohol was involved? I don't care, but the insurance company probably does so that would be my statement as well.
It wasn't at a bachelor party and it wasn't in the woods. It was at a former Hurricanes' player's family house, and the family was there.
People need to wait until information comes out before spreading rumours or jumping to conclusions but they don't. Unfortunately, this is how all the rumours and misinformation spreads in the absence of official statements and reports.
"Police say alcohol was consumed but not to excess and wasn't a contributing factor"
Lethbridge Hurricanes player in medically induced coma after weekend campfire incident | CBC News
Last edited: