Le Tricolore
Boo! BOOOO!
Continue here.
Remember not to discuss any rumours without any credible sources.
Remember not to discuss any rumours without any credible sources.
We don't see it the same. Too many soft types has ripple effects. A guy like Tatar got to play with Danault and Gallagher full time (for the most part) and the rest of them were bounced around a lot.
And Drouin got to play with Suzuki/Kotkaniemi and Anderson most of the time... do you call Anderson a soft player?
The season before he played with Armia and Domi
Two years ago with Domi and Shaw
His RW was always not soft... and he was always on the offensive line. Given PP time as well.
I'm still not sure how it affects Drouin never taking off.
I can't envision any scenario Drouin is back with the Habs next season.
I know you're not making excuses for Drouin, I just don't think this really tells us anything. Every winger in the league save for maybe Pastrnak/Marchand/Kucherov are going to produce more if you stick them with Scheifele and Wheeler full time (maybe not going forward since Wheeler's kinda washed now but you get what I mean). Lehkonen would produce more on that line too, I just don't see how that's meaningful context when it's true for basically ever player.Drouin belongs with a team like the Jets IMO. Ehlers does well with his skill/skating game while pretty much every other forward is big and strong.
This is not making excuses for Drouin. It's context on what situation he would do best in. I feel you think he sucks, sucks, sucks no matter the fit. I don't think that way
I know you're not making excuses for Drouin, I just don't think this really tells us anything. Every winger in the league save for maybe Pastrnak/Marchand/Kucherov are going to produce more if you stick them with Scheifele and Wheeler full time (maybe not going forward since Wheeler's kinda washed now but you get what I mean). Lehkonen would produce more on that line too, I just don't see how that's meaningful context when it's true for basically ever player.
Ehlers bounced around a lot this year too. He spent most time with Dubois + Connor, then 2nd most with Scheifele and either Connor/Copp, then a fair bit of time with Stastny as well. Last year was mostly with Roslovic and Wheeler. You have to go back to 18-19 for Ehlers to get a stable line with Scheifele and Wheeler. I just struggle to say that those linemates are better than Domi and Shaw were in 18-19, or Suzuki + Anderson this year. He spent over 70% of his ice time with Suzuki and almost all of that time was with Anderson as the other winger (and the times that weren't with Anderson he was mostly with Toffoli, and a small time with Armia). I just can't see him getting a better opportunity anywhere other than maybe Edmonton.
Again I don't disagree that he'd be better playing in the Jets top 6, I just don't think that tells us anything. Almost every forward in the league is going to score more playing 20 minutes a game with Scheifele and Wheeler/Connor than 16-18 with Suzuki and Anderson. Lehkonen would look better on that line too. I also don't really get the idea the Jets are a more physical group than the Habs. Lowry is their only guy that really hits much, Anderson/KK/Danault/Suzuki all play more physical than Wheeler/Dubois/Stastny, and Connor/Ehlers/Scheifele all average a hit every two games or less.Being bounced around with young centers vs the multiple mature options the Jets have are not the same thing. I stand firm. Drouin inserted with a more physical group looks better. But some will twist that into me saying he a star then. Not what I'm saying
I can't say for sure about Gaudreau, I'd suspect he'd be fine though. But what about Toffoli? He was new to the team, bounced around with the same two young centers Drouin had and had the best season of his career. I just have a hard time believing that Anderson/Armia/Shaw aren't physical enough wingers for Drouin, and Suzuki/Domi/Kotkaniemi aren't consistent enough for him after seeing Toffoli immediately take off with the same guys.I bet you Gaudreau would have struggled if he was in Drouin's spot on the Habs so far.
We will need a C to replace KKI can't envision any scenario Drouin is back with the Habs next season.
No... The only line that was stable was the Danault line. Rest of them were bounced around. We are far apart on this.
Drouin belongs with a team like the Jets IMO. Ehlers does well with his skill/skating game while pretty much every other forward is big and strong.
This is not making excuses for Drouin. It's context on what situation he would do best in. I feel you think he sucks, sucks, sucks no matter the fit. I don't think that way
NHL Lines Advanced Stats
Maybe this website is wrong, but it shows that in
2020-2021: The line of Drouin - Suzuki - Anderson was the most stable besides the Danault line
2019-2020: Drouin - Armia was a very stable pair. He only ever played with Gallagher for 40 mins.
2018-2019: Drouin - Domi - Shaw was the 2nd most stable line. And he played his second most minutes with Danault - Gallagher.
Your argument just doesn't hold, unless you tell me that Armia and Shaw are not top 6 players and it might have dragged Drouin down - then I agree. It just shows Drouin is not able to run his own line, he's a complementary, unidimensional winger.
Imo he was needed in Montreal because we lacked talent. He was solely needed for the PP and because we had no "solid" depth at LW.
Like Noob616 said... that would be true for any player on the Habs. They would all look better with those Jets first liners - who are part of the NHL elite.
And no, I don't think he sucks. He just is what he is: a 50 pts offense-first winger, who's not very good defensively. A complementary top 6 winger that helps on the PP.
What sucks is the trade that brought him here, but that's separated from Drouin the player - that's on MB
You can show me all kinds of stuff but after the Danault line, our forwards were bounced more than you think. I watched the games and I've been talking for a while now about how others have struggled because Danault had our two best wingers. It's been talked about a lot.
Did you really have to look that up?
pretty clear by now that Drouin does not have the hockey sense and work ethic to be an effective C in the NHL.We will need a C to replace KK
2 years left at 5.5 with 3 teams no trade list.
Subban has 1 year left at 9
Think Berge would do this? Lmfao
I'm guessing you missed the sarcasm in my postpretty clear by now that Drouin does not have the hockey sense and work ethic to be an effective C in the NHL.
I also think Drouin is finished with the Habs and the NHL.
let him go shine in Europe on the larger rink and lower caliber players. I can see him in the Swiss league.
I think the only chance he returns to the NHL is with us. I hope it works out and he’s comes back better than ever.
Not with Arizona or a team in a smaller market in dire need of offense?
Galchenyuk had plenty of teams try him in the last few years and I would consider Drouin the better player at this poiny
I don’t think so, no. I think the chances someone trades for him are basically zero.Not with Arizona or a team in a smaller market in dire need of offense?
Galchenyuk had plenty of teams try him in the last few years and I would consider Drouin the better player at this poiny