I am sorry for beating a dead horse but I had to reply to this response to my earlier post...
1) It is not 5 years ago but less than 5 days ago that Cam Ward beat the Leafs 2-1, the same Leafs that beat our #1 goalie last night...He was injured, but seems to have recovered, has won back the starting role, and has put a very strong statistical season, on a team that is Mc Daviding...The salary is the hardest part to accept about him, but like I said, if the Canes eat a million of that salary which would be then $5.5 for Ward vs. $3.9 for Pavs (with an extra year) there is no question which goalie I want. And again, for a team that needs to win now, not later (because a failure this year will affect the entire team mentally going into next year), the timing seems right.
2) As to Mc Clement, I do not see for an instant how you can say that a player who leads the Canes in PK icetime, on a team that is #1 in PK %, wins a similar amount draws, while playing over 13 minutes a game, and boasting impressive statistical numbers (like 8 Giveaways vs 33 Takeaways (find another forward at that ratio please)) is not better, and considerably better than Jim Slater, who is trending towards obscurity. Mc Clement-Frolik to start every PK is a step in the right direction...I think maybe the next one is to sit Stuart, start with Buff-Trouba, followed by Enstrom-Myers. Having a confident, winning goalie is the most important one.
3) Trading Kane has left us thinner on LW, something that Stafford does not address. Perrault's injury further thinned us out. Frolik can play LW but seems to be more comfortable at RW, and if you are referring to Armia, or O'Dell they are both righties too, so there is no immediate help in that area. Which is why I chose Rask, as I think Lindholm would require a bigger piece than Burmi.
I don't mean to be offensive, but I really want to win now, with astute management and good scouting, and I would start by getting more winners on this team, and the best place to find winners in the heat of the battle is on the losing teams, sorry...
Originally Posted by voyageur View Post
Sorry Mr. Snerrd, but that is not very accurate. Was it not Cam Ward who was invited to the Team Canada Olympic camp, as a potential top 2/3 goalie in the nation, not Bernier, Reimer, or any other of the goalies we want to trade for. Statistically. boasting a .913 save % and 2.39 GAA on a terrible Canes team puts him closer to Hutch numbers than Pav's numbers...Then you ignored the premise of my whole dissertation, which was that we have a window that is this year and next year to win...Our winners and leaders, Ladd, Buff and Frolik could all be gone in this time. Adding a winner, who would easily integrate into our dressing room, at a position which would inspire confidence in our entire team's play (does anyone on these boards think that Pavs inspires confidence in his teammates letting in stinkers, and struggling with rebound control?) reverberates. Really trading for Ward would cost us one year of an inflated salary (which we could probably get the Canes to eat $1 million out of for next year, just to get him off the books), but is there a more important position to invest in? NO. One year with a veteran winning goalie, as we develop our future (Helleybuck and Comrie) to replace him seems like good management. Does anyone see Pavs value appreciating? His extra year of contract will also impede that internal development as I can not see us having Helleybuck and Comrie in the minors for 2 consecutive years. Even next year, it is conceivable that one is loaned to another team, just to ensure playing time...Unless we really want to go with 2 raw goalies to inspire our vets to re-sign here, which was the premise of my whole discourse.
You can say that Rask is not worth Burmi, that is your entitled opinion, but he is a 2 way forward, with junior/AHL/NHL development, who has 5 less points than so called stars (Skinner and Tlusty) on the Canes. 3rd line, 2 way forward, which is likely all Burmi will ever be, so I say apples and oranges. Difference: Rask can contribute this year.
If you think Mc Clement is not a better centre than Slater, you are mistaken. He centred a good 3rd line in St. Louis for many years. Key PKer. Also has that intangible that is missing on this team: playoff experience. That's how I see it, anyways.
I agree with the bolded part. That's all.
Ward has bounced back somewhat this year from poor a couple of years ago to really horrible last year. I couldn't care less about an Olympic tryout invite, please. He is extremely expensive for 1 year and isn't a solution to anything. It seems to me you are remembering both him and McClement as they were 5 years ago. Sorry, neither one is any improvement over what we have and not worth the effort of the phone calls. Rask is not horrible. He is young and in just his 1st NHL season. He is doing reasonable well but he has never excelled at any lower level so there is no reason to expect much from him. We have his equal in St John's now.