I'm not exaggerating his injuries. What are you talking about?
"he's proven he's a depth defenseman who gets hurt."
What were you implying by this statement then???
He may not be dumb, I have absolutely no idea if he is or not. But fighting this battle is stupid. There is absolutely no history of a player like him being paid what he's asking
History means nothing when negotiating contracts, it is simply establishing a common ground where once a deal is struck neither side feels like a loser.
According to reports the Sens have made four proposals of 2, 4, 6 & 8 years.
The only numbers I have seen are the $28M for 8 years and today the $11.4M for 4 years.
Personally I believe Cowen is best with a 2 year bridge deal, in the $2.2M - $2.5M range. It offers him the best opportunity to maximize his future earnings through performance and of course offers the potential to negotiate his next contract in a higher cap world.
Makes me wonder what the Sens offered on a two year deal and is it fair?
Since I believe the Sens don't want Cowen on a two year deal, I would guess their proposal for two years probably isn't very appealing.
So before I jump onto the Cowen is trying to set history bandwagon, this information is key for me.