If we win lottery and another team wants Celebrini badly would you consider a trade ?

[dj Mahoney]

I'm thinking for something like a mid 1st rder (2024) , 2nd rder (2024) , and 1st rder (2025) and a b grade prospect ? I guess its boils down to how good do most think Celebrini will be ? Fire Away

Click to read more...

 

[CallMeShaft]

No.

 

[Styles]

No. You don’t take quantity over quality. We need high end talent we will have plenty of lower tier players in the pipeline with all the picks we have already.

 

[Mrfenn92]

Celebrini only

 

[Space umpire]

I'm thinking for something like a mid 1st rder (2024) , 2nd rder (2024) , and 1st rder (2025) and a b grade prospect ? I guess its boils down to how good do most think Celebrini will be ? Fire Away

In general, it’s the #1 pick. I don’t want to move it but if you blow me away with an offer. … your proposal doesn’t do that at all.
It would take something top end in this draft (pick 2 to maybe 7). An unprotected 1st next year, the right to switch 1sts in 26, and a top 5 prospects.
Most (all?) pundits have Celebrini clearly above the rest of the class. That costs.

That’s team xx, for Chicago? No, I don’t move it. Lots already in the system is going to play and play well. Can’t give away a 1st talent.

 

[WarriorofTime]

You're not trading down 15 spots for a '25 1st, '24 2nd and depth prospect.

 

[dj Mahoney]

In general, it’s the #1 pick. I don’t want to move it but if you blow me away with an offer. … your proposal doesn’t do that at all.
It would take something top end in this draft (pick 2 to maybe 7). An unprotected 1st next year, the right to switch 1sts in 26, and a top 5 prospects.
Most (all?) pundits have Celebrini clearly above the rest of the class. That costs.

That’s team xx, for Chicago? No, I don’t move it. Lots already in the system is going to play and play well. Can’t give away a 1st talent.

Yes I'm pretty much of the same mind, you have to blow me away . At least another 1st rder . We are pretty deep at all positions so Davidson would have to take the team to the woodshed with a crazy offer .

 

[pvr]

Celebrini.

 

[Joemoe]

Nope, you take the win and go from there.

 

[Illinihockey]

Absolutely not

 

[No Fun Shogun]

For that? No.

For a heftier offer? Depends on how much more, but Celebrini seems like great, but not exceptional, first overall kind of prospect, so I wouldn't say no to an absolute haul.

 

[hockeydoug]

Phi, and AZ, and Buffalo and Ottawa enjoy making bad decisions. Definitely worth a listen to what they have to say.

If it's anybody else, hard pass at even considering it.

Sorry Utah, going to take a few months to adjust.

 

[DisgruntledHawkFan]

You don't trade the first overall pick for a pair of mid firsts a second round pick and a decent prospect ever in the NHL.

 

[ChiHawks10]

Yeah, that's a big no from me.

 

[EddieTheEagle]

 

[TheFridge]

View attachment 860028

This is the correct response.

 

[HawksDub89]

That offer is dog sh**

That would get KD fired. A couple mid 1sts and a 2nd with a throw in prospect? Lol

By that logic the hawks could trade the Tampa and Toronto 1sts plus a prospect and keep their own 1st pick plus Celebrini.

See how ridiculous that sounds?

 

[Wally1112pac]

Yes.

 

[u2wojo]

Hell no. If Anaheim wanted to swap #3 OA and throw in MacTavish or next years unprotected 1st, or Utah wants to do #6OA, their 2nd and either Guether or next years unprotected 1st....sure there is a conversation starter. You have to overpay to get a team off the #1 OA when there is a top line elite playere like Celebrini that should turn into a star player there to take.

 

[Northernhawk]

I’d trade him, Lukas Reichel and a pick for a signed, in his prime Brady Tkachauk

 

[Mrfenn92]

I’d trade him, Lukas Reichel and a pick for a signed, in his prime Brady Tkachauk

No thanks

 

[DisgruntledHawkFan]

I’d trade him, Lukas Reichel and a pick for a signed, in his prime Brady Tkachauk

Good lord no.

 

[CallMeShaft]

I’d trade him, Lukas Reichel and a pick for a signed, in his prime Brady Tkachauk

Celebrini's upside is Toews/Bergeron and he's only a year younger than Bedard.

Why would you trade away a Bedard/Celebrini duo for the next 15-20 years for a guy who'll turn 25 before next season?

 

[x Tame Impala]

No. Generally whoever is giving up the best asset in a trade loses that trade. Maybe if they took a deal with SJS, ANH, or CBJ to swap this year's 1st and get that team's 2025 1st (potentially 2 top 5 picks) it could make some sense but there'd really have to be something wrong with Celebrini for that to make sense.

I wouldn't have traded Bedard for that same respective deal last year so i don't know why a team would want to do it this year unless Celebrini is a lot closer to Lafreniere than he is to Toews/Bedard

 

[clydesdale line]

I can at least understand the Fantilli angle. This one is just all types of bad.