Ideas for Future Studies

Discussion in 'By The Numbers' started by Bear of Bad News, Jul 27, 2012.

  1. stlblues5

    stlblues5 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2016
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    St Louis
    Okay so this might be obvious and a useless statistic, but it's just an idea. A players shooting percentage on specific goalies? Like baseball players have a batting average against specific pictures. Again, just a thought, so let me know if this would be useless.
     
  2. morehockeystats

    morehockeystats Unusual hockey stats

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2016
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Occupation:
    sysadmin
    Location:
    San Jose
    Home Page:
  3. Connor McDaigle

    Connor McDaigle Eetu, Brute?

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    2,417
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    67
    This is something I'd like to see as well. It is (to my knowledge) very, very rare for a player to play 200+ AHL games before becoming an impact NHLer. Just like playing your 100th game in the ECHL means you're probably never going to make it, a players 200th AHL game probably has a pretty similar (though not as drastic) meaning.
     
  4. stlblues5

    stlblues5 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2016
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    St Louis
    Let me know if this has been done already. I think it would be interesting to see the chance of success based on what pick you get drafted in the first round. So, let's say you get drafted 1st overall, and the success rate from that pick is 75%. Another person gets drafted 16th and their success rate from that pick is 55%. Logically, it would decrease the later you get drafted but I wonder if some interesting data could come out of this. Another thing would be what defines success? Being a full-time NHL starter or backup goalie? Having a certain PPG or GAA?
     
  5. morehockeystats

    morehockeystats Unusual hockey stats

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2016
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Occupation:
    sysadmin
    Location:
    San Jose
    Home Page:
    I sort of considered doing that, but defining a "success" is tough.
     
  6. stlblues5

    stlblues5 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2016
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    St Louis
    I think it would be a cool study. I think an easy way to define success would be 100 NHL games played but that doesn't necessarily mean they were a contributor to the team. Another way would be to come up with a "success formula" of sorts. I don't know what numbers or statistics that would entail, but if the formula came out with a number above a certain amount, they would be considered a success.
     
  7. morehockeystats

    morehockeystats Unusual hockey stats

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2016
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Occupation:
    sysadmin
    Location:
    San Jose
    Home Page:
    I am working on it right now, first on goaltenders, because their contribution - and I am using exactly this term - is easier to define.
     
  8. trentmccleary

    trentmccleary Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Messages:
    21,318
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    176
    Location:
    Alfie-Ville
    Home Page:
    Theory: Hockey writers are fans who watch 82 of their home team's games and a maximum of 82 'other' miscellaneous regular season games. That is until tournaments (Olympics, playoffs, etc) dominate the sport and their focus is directed squarely at a handful of star players. The spotlight of these tournaments gives players an advantage when trophy ballots are cast over players who didn't have that spotlight.

    Test: Assess whether star players have higher trophy finishes immediately after a 3rd round+ postseason or being a key player on an Olympic medal winning team.

    I know this post is super old, but if anybody wants to pick up the mantle...
    pre-1998... the Selke was a +/- award
    post-1998... the Selke was a SH TOI award
    post-2008... the Selke was a takeaway award (for a few obvious years anyways)

    I did the top-10 drafted forwards within a decade and chose 3rd highest scoring season to compare. It isn't likely to be an outlier and is essentially the median of their 5 best years. The data collection is very time consuming though.
     
  9. morehockeystats

    morehockeystats Unusual hockey stats

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2016
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Occupation:
    sysadmin
    Location:
    San Jose
    Home Page:
    I did something like that.
    First, I calculated the averages and the weighted averages for each draft pick:
    http://morehockeystats.com/drafts/pickstats
    Then, I compared whether the player picked at that position exceeded, met or failed the expectations:
    http://morehockeystats.com/drafts/picksuccess

    I know this is a bit crude, but something to work with...
    This will be the last update on my site until the new season starts. Gotta rework data collection, optimize the page publishing and improve the performance of the website.

    Always open for new suggestions!
     
  10. morehockeystats

    morehockeystats Unusual hockey stats

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2016
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Occupation:
    sysadmin
    Location:
    San Jose
    Home Page:
    As I understand, the board does not have an API to post from scripts, does it?
     
  11. stlblues5

    stlblues5 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2016
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    St Louis
    I once did a study on teams percentage of drafted prospects turning out to be quality players(100 or more nhl games played) and they all turned out to be working 0.3 percent of each other.
     
  12. Bear of Bad News

    Bear of Bad News HFBoards Escape Goat

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    5,620
    Likes Received:
    78
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Location:
    Windsor
    Nothing I'm aware of, no.
     
  13. oilerbear

    oilerbear Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,967
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    66
    That would be me, it is one of the 14+ base hockey theories I created in the last 12 years.
    From observations that have stayed with me from the age of 4 (50yrs ago) till now.

    1.Offensive Dmen are OFFENSIVE!:
    A. almost all offensive Dmen generate even offence at a 9,10,11, 12, 13, 14, NHL Fwd and 1st line AHL (15, 16, 17 NHL) fwd level.
    B. By system structure they have to abandon the defence of free path to their own HD area. (what was called ricki's for the first 10-6 years ago.).
    It is one of my 4 most critical theories to define cap value of Def play.
    Because they occupy forward spce down low they need to be compared to the players space they are occupying!
    C. Offensive Dmen yielf high HD Shot rates. Often have very high EVGA rates.

    2. Failed offensive play (fwds/Off D) establishes the CA rates.
    it is only a measure of the players active in the Offensive Structure of the Team.

    3. Dpairs Establish the average save % a goalie performs around.
    A. there is a standard rate for HD shots in a 30 shot game.
    B. HD Theory values.
    Avg HD shot .8250 Save% 17.5% success.
    Avg LD shot .9650 Save% 3.5% success
    17.5:3.5 = 5:1
    C. AVG HD Dpair
    10.5 HDSH/60 X .8250 = 8.6625 saves
    19.5 HDSH/60 x .9650 = 18.8175 saves
    (8.6625sv + 18.8175sv)/30 Sh = .9160 Save%
    D. Elite HD Dpair
    7.5 HDSH/60 X .825 = 6.1875 saves
    22.5 LDSH/60 x .965 = 21.7125 saves
    (6.1875sv + 21.7125sv)/30 SH = .9300 Save%
    E. Poor HD Dpair
    14.0 HDSH/60 X .825 = 11.55 saves
    16.0 LDSH/60 X .965 = 15.44 saves
    (11.55sv + 15.44sv)/30 Sh = .8997 Save%
     
  14. oilerbear

    oilerbear Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,967
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    66
    This is a utter waste of time without the correct reference.

    My first 3 critical Base theories:
    1. Hockey is like playing chess:
    A. it is a series of dynamic moves, that must be tracked individually.
    B. 2-10 groups of measure result in multiple levels of permutations
    C. Hockey must be analized with an empirical approach.
    D. Trying to identify the players best and worst at critical performance skills.

    2. Seasonal expected mean and performance variance range +/- based on team, comp, ZS.
    A. the first critical thing is defining true ZS. not based on just FO,
    but also the affect of coaches decision to send a player on when their team is with or without procession.
    B. I generated
    8 groups upper & lower 1st, 2nd 3rd, 4th line Team
    x 8 groups upper & lower 1st, 2nd 3rd, 4th line comp
    x 8 groups of ZS based on Standard deviations
    = 512 groups of 3 axis blocks in a 3D performance matrix.
    C. By holding 2 Axis constant you can see an area graph of Variable affect on any important stat over that given axis range.
    D. It allows you to allows you compare (stack) a series of area graphs over a 2 axis range.
    E. It is apparent you need all 3 variables to establish a stats mean to compare a player against.
    Not much long after I presented this on Lowetide, Rob Vollman created a player usage chart based on 2 variables.
    2 variables makes on performance reference false.
    F. My 2 favourite Stats:
    -Goal diff (+/-) avg range fro all 512 groups. -29 to +30.
    - EVP/60 .25 to 3.05
     
  15. morehockeystats

    morehockeystats Unusual hockey stats

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2016
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Occupation:
    sysadmin
    Location:
    San Jose
    Home Page:
    No, not really.
    Said by a US Chess Master and someone who considers Elo function as the best evaluation method.
     
  16. OvermanKingGainer

    OvermanKingGainer #FreeBennett #CurseofTheSpulll

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    Messages:
    9,967
    Likes Received:
    284
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Occupation:
    Space Pirate
    Location:
    2018 Cup to Calgary
    I would like to see if there is any way to acquire or estimate TOI numbers from the 90s and prior. I see the ATOI for guys like Sakic, Lemieux, Bure and these guys played 25-28 minutes a game and it wasn't even the 80s yet.
     
  17. Doctor No

    Doctor No Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2005
    Messages:
    6,994
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Home Page:
    Iain Fyffe's done some work there - if I get a chance, I'll see if I can find it.
     
  18. Doctor No

    Doctor No Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2005
    Messages:
    6,994
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Home Page:

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"