WC: How would Team Canada fare in the NHL?

Top 6 Spaling

Registered User
Jun 23, 2010
12,345
226
Smashville
Weak in net, above average on the blueline, beyond deadly at forward. They'd be the cup favorite, even with their bad goaltending.

Crosby, Giroux, Seguin, Spezza, Duchene, Mackinnon, ROR, and Eberle all in one forward group would just dominate teams.
 

Braun

Registered User
Apr 17, 2014
2,362
1,213
Montreal
I think goaltending would be an issue but after that I would say they would be a top 5 team for sure.
 

Caeldan

Whippet Whisperer
Jun 21, 2008
15,459
1,046
They'd be a President's Trophy dynasty, but exposed by the second round of the playoffs every year.
It's a run and gun team... the defense is mostly 'offense' first or PP specialists, and the goalies are extremely weak. Smith's strength though is the puckhandling to assist the offense.
 

FDBluth

Registered User
Jul 2, 2004
11,231
1,214
Kelowna, BC
This team would clearly be the odds-on favourite. The top nine would decimate any other's. No team would be able to keep up, especially for seven games. Doesn't matter if Smith's in net or not.
 

Caeldan

Whippet Whisperer
Jun 21, 2008
15,459
1,046
This team would clearly be the odds-on favourite. The top nine would decimate any other's. No team would be able to keep up, especially for seven games. Doesn't matter if Smith's in net or not.

I'd say that this year's Tampa, Chicago, New York and Washington all could likely handle this Team Canada roster in a seven game series.

They have the speed to create a strong forecheck, plus the defense to match TC's offense.
 

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
37,863
11,220
I'd say that this year's Tampa, Chicago, New York and Washington all could likely handle this Team Canada roster in a seven game series.

They have the speed to create a strong forecheck, plus the defense to match TC's offense.

Washington and Tampa would get ABSOLUTELY THRASHED. They'd get decimated. Chicago and the Rangers could hold their own. Anaheim could compete but definitely lose. The rest, it's not even up for debate.
 

stempniaksen

Registered User
Oct 12, 2008
11,089
4,374
I think the Rangers could beat them in the playoffs. They'd probably run away with the presidents trophy though, that's alot of firepower.
 

Captain Bowie

Registered User
Jan 18, 2012
27,139
4,414
Iffy in net. Good D but without a true #1 (yet) but very young. But that forward group man...
 

FDBluth

Registered User
Jul 2, 2004
11,231
1,214
Kelowna, BC
I'd say that this year's Tampa, Chicago, New York and Washington all could likely handle this Team Canada roster in a seven game series.

They have the speed to create a strong forecheck, plus the defense to match TC's offense.
Not when it would come in the waves that this Canada team would send it. You've got Crosby playing with two first liners for the first time ever, which would be more than enough for a top defensive pairing to handle. And then on other lines you've still got the likes of Giroux, Duchene, Mackinnon, Spezza, Seguin and O'Reilly. How would any NHL team keep up with that many dangerous offensive players continuing to come over the boards? That's wayyy too much forward depth for any team to handle. And Canada's defense, while lacking a true stud (Ekblad will become one in time), certainly isn't weak. Goaltending is a question mark though, but it would really be an afterthought on this team. It's basically like another Chicago team on steroids, which is already almost too good for nearly any other NHL team.

Give that team 82 games to get their feet under them and it would be extremely difficult for any team to beat them.
 

Hanji

Registered User
Oct 14, 2009
3,169
2,662
Wisconsin
They'd decimate the NHL. Nobody has the depth to contain that firepower, nor the offense to match it.
 

officialmark*

Guest
lol @ people saying they wouldn't be good in the playoffs

They'd be a dynasty.
 

Canucks LB

My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
Oct 12, 2008
77,563
31,534
dynasty, nobody could roll 4 lines vs this team, nobody
 

Patchey*

Guest
Solid contenders each and every year. Their forward corps are super stacked
 

gela

Registered User
Dec 26, 2013
200
0
Nashville
They're not a complete team. They're weak on the back end and it goal. Sure their forwards are good enough to propel them into the playoffs and get them tagged as contenders but annual second-round exit sounds about right.
 

Gormo

Holupchi
Nov 12, 2010
1,700
434
If that meant Mclellan would be their coach, then definitely, but they think they'd dominate regardless.

They may not have the star power, but their defense is extremely good too. No weak 3rd pairing, not even close.

Often a goalie only needs to be competent when he has a good defense in front of him.
 

ProspectsSTC

Registered User
Jul 12, 2014
3,474
2,021
They're not a complete team. They're weak on the back end and it goal. Sure their forwards are good enough to propel them into the playoffs and get them tagged as contenders but annual second-round exit sounds about right.

How are they weak on the back end?
 

playasRus

Registered User
Mar 21, 2009
9,284
2,015
Not to mention they'd have 82 games to build chemistry and it's not elimination in playoffs like it is at WC.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad