HOH Top-40 Goalies Voter Record - ContrarianGoaltender

seventieslord

Student Of The Game
Mar 16, 2006
36,191
7,339
Regina, SK
Round 1 List
http://web.archive.org/web/20161020185003/http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1343493

Players on the top-40 not ranked:

None

Players on the top-40 ranked below #50:

None

Players exclusive to this list and no more than two others:

Sean Burke (36) – one of three
Dan Bouchard (37) – one of two
Gilles Meloche (52)
Mike Palmater (55)

Players ranked highest on this list:

Bernie Parent (5)
Roberto Luongo (25)
John Vanbiesbrouck (27)
Sean Burke (36)
Dan Bouchard (37)
Gilles Meloche (52)
Mike Palmater (55)

Players ranked lowest on this list:

Terry Sawchuk (9)
Miikka Kiprusoff (58)
Tomas Vokoun (60)

Note that Vokoun was only on 4 lists, so other participants ranked him even lower.

Round 2 voting record:

Round 2 participation record:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

TheDevilMadeMe

Registered User
Aug 28, 2006
52,271
6,982
Brooklyn
I know you explained Palmateer in the aggregate list thread, but curious to hear the reasoning behind some of the other high rankings (Burke, Bouchard, Meloche are the ones IDed as higher than anyone else).

I know you mentioned that you ranked Parent too high on your original list, but boy did your opinion of him drop like a rock. Interested to know your thought process there.

(By the way, I hope nobody gets offended by talking about the thought process that went into their list and votes - I think it is valuable to helping understand how our final list was put together. There are definitely some "weird" votes on my list too).
 

ContrarianGoaltender

Registered User
Feb 28, 2007
868
788
tcghockey.com
I know you explained Palmateer in the aggregate list thread, but curious to hear the reasoning behind some of the other high rankings (Burke, Bouchard, Meloche are the ones IDed as higher than anyone else).

Bouchard and Burke rank 3rd and 5th in career GVT among all goalies who did not make our top 40. Neither of them played for a great team, and both of them solidly outplayed their backups at their peaks. Both of them were quite possibly also more talented than their records suggest. Burke was getting by mainly on his talent in his early career before he started to focus on his technique, and then put up terrific stats in the early '00s in a league environment that really suited big, blocking style butterfly goalies (unfortunately he just did it in the relative anonymity of Phoenix).

I've rated Bouchard pretty highly for a while based on his save percentage and record vs. backups. He was considered by a lot of observers (including Ken Dryden) to have all the talent in the world but one who struggled mentally at times. His playoff record was poor, both overall and when you look at high leverage situations, so there might be something to that, but I think his regular season success is pretty strong and I don't rate playoff performance as high as others here do.

Meloche is a goalie that has a lot of defenders who will say that he was as good as some of the guys on much better teams, but never got the accolades because he also played on bottom-feeders. I think those repots might be a bit overblown, it's actually hard to make the statistical case that he was among the very best in the league when comparing him to the other goalies he played with, at least for much of his career, but some of his seasons were very impressive.

Finally, all three of them have very good longevity, which just adds to the rest of their resumes. Here's an interesting stat: Every goalie who played over 600 games in their career prior to league expansion in the early '90s is in our top 40, with the exception of Meloche and Bouchard. I think it's pretty likely that in different scenarios with more team support they would have managed some of the more high-profile accomplishments that typically put goalies on all-time lists, and at the end of the day I just decided to go with Meloche over some of the average goalies on strong teams that others were putting at the bottom of their lists (Osgood, Vernon, etc.).

I know you mentioned that you ranked Parent too high on your original list, but boy did your opinion of him drop like a rock. Interested to know your thought process there.

In short, the main reason I had Parent that high originally is because I thought there were some good arguments to have him above Ken Dryden. Once I changed my mind on that relative ranking, and started comparing Parent directly to different groups of goalies, some of his weaknesses became a bit more apparent and he ended up dropping quite a bit down the list as you can see.

I had Parent very high initially because his overall save percentage record was very good, and I had him rated pretty well relative to backup goalies on a study I did from some time ago, so I figured if anything his numbers were probably understated given how many penalties the Flyers took and the fact that he played on an expansion team in the late '60s. I also had some numbers from high-leverage playoff situations that suggested Parent was very strong in close games while Dryden padded his stats a bit in blowouts.

I changed my mind after looking more closely at Parent's early career results, particularly relative to Doug Favell and Jacques Plante. It seems pretty clear that the Flyers were doing a decent job defensively, despite being an expansion team. There was also a fairly consistent opinion from contemporary sources that Plante had a big impact on Parent while played together in Toronto, which is a big reason why Parent was able to elevate his game during to his Philly peak, which works against the theory that he was an all-time great goalie all along. I also figured that I was probably overcompensating for the Flyers' team discipline and not enough for their team shot quality in the mid-'70s, given the unbalanced league.

Parent also suffered in my round 2 rankings from a general shift between focusing on peak to focusing on the length of a guy's extended prime and rewarding elite consistency. Obviously Parent's injuries had an impact on the length of his prime, though, and it's tough to adjust for that.
 

MXD

Original #4
Oct 27, 2005
50,824
16,555
I dislike...

+ Broda that high in Round 1 (at least compared to Durnan)
+ Sean Burke at 36. I can somewhat understand Burke's placement with Joseph's placement, AS FAR AS REGULAR SEASON IS CONCERNED. But Joseph was an above-average playoff performer; Burke was not only an below-average one, but he was squarely below replcement level if you take out his first season. Actually, Burke at 36 with Giacomin at 41 seems odd.


I like...

+ Corrected the big gap between Broda and Durnan in round 2
+ Proper consideration given to Joseph in both rounds
 

ContrarianGoaltender

Registered User
Feb 28, 2007
868
788
tcghockey.com
+ Sean Burke at 36. I can somewhat understand Burke's placement with Joseph's placement, AS FAR AS REGULAR SEASON IS CONCERNED. But Joseph was an above-average playoff performer; Burke was not only an below-average one, but he was squarely below replcement level if you take out his first season. Actually, Burke at 36 with Giacomin at 41 seems odd.

This gets to a difference of evaluation method, probably. I don't make conclusions about goalies based on small sample sizes, and I don't generally make significant distinctions between regular season and playoff performance unless I think there are strong contextual reasons to do so. That means Burke loses almost nothing in my evaluation scheme because he didn't have a large playoff sample (just 345 shots against in the playoffs between the ages of 22 and 34), although I understand why others would disagree with that perspective.

Also, I took into account international play for goalies, which is a significant plus for Burke, and something to look at if you doubt his ability in big games.

As for Giacomin, after all the debates I continue to see him as highly overrated. I'm actually surprised that someone else ranked him lower on their original list than I did.
 

MXD

Original #4
Oct 27, 2005
50,824
16,555
This gets to a difference of evaluation method, probably. I don't make conclusions about goalies based on small sample sizes, and I don't generally make significant distinctions between regular season and playoff performance unless I think there are strong contextual reasons to do so. That means Burke loses almost nothing in my evaluation scheme because he didn't have a large playoff sample (just 345 shots against in the playoffs between the ages of 22 and 34), although I understand why others would disagree with that perspective.

Also, I took into account international play for goalies, which is a significant plus for Burke, and something to look at if you doubt his ability in big games.

As for Giacomin, after all the debates I continue to see him as highly overrated. I'm actually surprised that someone else ranked him lower on their original list than I did.

Awesome reply. While Burke basically Giacomined in the playoffs, he effectively didn't play that much in the playoffs, and his absence in the playoffs can doesn't stem from his regular season play; a proposition you probably agree with, considering you ranked him 36.
 

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
29,560
18,068
Connecticut
I liked seeing Burke, Irbe and Meloche.

Not on my list because I've got no guts.

Goalies who were not exactly in ideal career situations.

All 3 will be forever underrated in my opinion.
 

TheDevilMadeMe

Registered User
Aug 28, 2006
52,271
6,982
Brooklyn
I had already submitted my list when CG made his case for Irbe in the preliminary thread - I submitted my list to the project email address right before opening voting to everyone else, so I wouldn't be biased by what I saw on other lists

But I would have seriously given Irbe consideration for the 50s range after reading his post there. Not a big deal though, since the final product was "only" a top 40.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,313
138,973
Bojangles Parking Lot
Thankfully, the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine captured the lists for this project, which were deleted during HF's adventure in software upgrades. Restoring them here in case the Wayback Machine link ever goes dead.

1Dominik Hasek
2Jacques Plante
3Glenn Hall
4Patrick Roy
5Bernie Parent
6Ken Dryden
7Martin Brodeur
8Frank Brimsek
9Terry Sawchuk
10Turk Broda
11Tony Esposito
12Johnny Bower
13Charlie Gardiner
14Ed Belfour
15Georges Vezina
16Vladislav Tretiak
17Clint Benedict
18Bill Durnan
19George Hainsworth
20Gump Worsley
21Jiri Holecek
22Roy Worters
23Tiny Thompson
24Curtis Joseph
25Roberto Luongo
26Rogie Vachon
27John Vanbiesbrouck
28Billy Smith
29Hugh Lehman
30Grant Fuhr
31Tom Barrasso
32Henrik Lundqvist
33Chuck Rayner
34Tim Thomas
35Hap Holmes
36Sean Burke
37Dan Bouchard
38Mike Liut
39Vladimir Dzurilla
40Harry Lumley
41Ed Giacomin
42Gerry Cheevers
43Percy LeSueur
44Alec Connell
45Al Rollins
46Chico Resch
47Jean-Sebastien Giguere
48Mike Richter
49Dave Kerr
50Lorne Chabot
51Ryan Miller
52Gilles Meloche
53Arturs Irbe
54Seth Martin
55Mike Palmateer
56Paddy Moran
57Leif Holmqvist
58Miikka Kiprusoff
59Pete Peeters
60Tomas Vokoun
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad