I know you explained Palmateer in the aggregate list thread, but curious to hear the reasoning behind some of the other high rankings (Burke, Bouchard, Meloche are the ones IDed as higher than anyone else).
Bouchard and Burke rank 3rd and 5th in career GVT among all goalies who did not make our top 40. Neither of them played for a great team, and both of them solidly outplayed their backups at their peaks. Both of them were quite possibly also more talented than their records suggest. Burke was getting by mainly on his talent in his early career before he started to focus on his technique, and then put up terrific stats in the early '00s in a league environment that really suited big, blocking style butterfly goalies (unfortunately he just did it in the relative anonymity of Phoenix).
I've rated Bouchard pretty highly for a while based on his save percentage and record vs. backups. He was considered by a lot of observers (including Ken Dryden) to have all the talent in the world but one who struggled mentally at times. His playoff record was poor, both overall and when you look at high leverage situations, so there might be something to that, but I think his regular season success is pretty strong and I don't rate playoff performance as high as others here do.
Meloche is a goalie that has a lot of defenders who will say that he was as good as some of the guys on much better teams, but never got the accolades because he also played on bottom-feeders. I think those repots might be a bit overblown, it's actually hard to make the statistical case that he was among the very best in the league when comparing him to the other goalies he played with, at least for much of his career, but some of his seasons were very impressive.
Finally, all three of them have very good longevity, which just adds to the rest of their resumes. Here's an interesting stat: Every goalie who played over 600 games in their career prior to league expansion in the early '90s is in our top 40, with the exception of Meloche and Bouchard. I think it's pretty likely that in different scenarios with more team support they would have managed some of the more high-profile accomplishments that typically put goalies on all-time lists, and at the end of the day I just decided to go with Meloche over some of the average goalies on strong teams that others were putting at the bottom of their lists (Osgood, Vernon, etc.).
I know you mentioned that you ranked Parent too high on your original list, but boy did your opinion of him drop like a rock. Interested to know your thought process there.
In short, the main reason I had Parent that high originally is because I thought there were some good arguments to have him above Ken Dryden. Once I changed my mind on that relative ranking, and started comparing Parent directly to different groups of goalies, some of his weaknesses became a bit more apparent and he ended up dropping quite a bit down the list as you can see.
I had Parent very high initially because his overall save percentage record was very good, and I had him rated pretty well relative to backup goalies on a study I did from some time ago, so I figured if anything his numbers were probably understated given how many penalties the Flyers took and the fact that he played on an expansion team in the late '60s. I also had some numbers from high-leverage playoff situations that suggested Parent was very strong in close games while Dryden padded his stats a bit in blowouts.
I changed my mind after looking more closely at Parent's early career results, particularly relative to Doug Favell and Jacques Plante. It seems pretty clear that the Flyers were doing a decent job defensively, despite being an expansion team. There was also a fairly consistent opinion from contemporary sources that Plante had a big impact on Parent while played together in Toronto, which is a big reason why Parent was able to elevate his game during to his Philly peak, which works against the theory that he was an all-time great goalie all along. I also figured that I was probably overcompensating for the Flyers' team discipline and not enough for their team shot quality in the mid-'70s, given the unbalanced league.
Parent also suffered in my round 2 rankings from a general shift between focusing on peak to focusing on the length of a guy's extended prime and rewarding elite consistency. Obviously Parent's injuries had an impact on the length of his prime, though, and it's tough to adjust for that.