HOFers: Legit or not

Discussion in 'The History of Hockey' started by Big Phil, Dec 30, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Big Phil

    Big Phil Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    26,992
    Likes Received:
    279
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Here's a list of either reitred or current NHLers who are either possibly destined for the Hall or are going to be, or are already in there. Should they or shouldnt they?


    Adam Oates - Over 1400 points. Second team all-star in '91. No Cups, two Cup finals. 156 playoff points. led the league in assists three times. 5 times a top ten scorer, 3 of those fives times he was in the top three. Highest point seasons: 142, 115, 112, 102, 99.

    Verdict: To me Oates is a shoo-in. A lot of people debate him but I say why? this is a guy who was the best pure passer after Gretzky. He had highs of 45 and 32 goals. After that it was 25. He wasnt a pure goal scorer but he still could score if he had to. he was just better at passing. look at his stats though they speak volumes. Sure fire HOFer IMO.


    Gary Suter - 844 career points. One Cup in '89. Second team all-star in '88. Calder Trophy in '86. Average playoff numbers.

    Verdict: He'll be a guy that'll be heavily debated for a while. In the late 80 to mid 90s he was a very good defenseman. Not great though, and its hard for a defenseman to get into the Hall with only one post season all-star nod. Serge Savard did, but he also won 8 Cups and a Conn Smythe trophy. With Suter I'll admit he's close but its hard to consider him great. He put up good offensive numbers, but he lacked the all around play that Chelios posessed. I'll say no to him.


    Paul Kariya - No Cups, one Cup final. Average playoff numbers. Highest point totals: 108, 101, 99, 86, 81. So far. First team all-star ('96, '97, '99) second team ('00, '03). Career high 50 goals in a season. So far above a point per game in his career.

    Verdict: This one is also tough. it might be safe to say that Kariya is a shadow of his former self. his '03-04 season was very bad for him. but we cant have short memories either. Remember in say, '96-97 to about '98-99 he was considered to be the best in the game? maybe Jagr and Hasek were better depending on who you asked, but he was right there with them. In '98 he had 17 goals in 22 games before Suter gave him a concussion. My opinion is that if Kariya goes on the way he is in Nashville and puts up good numbers then he'll get into the HOF just based on what he did before he was 29. That alone, along with 5 or 6 "solid" more seasons shoudl get him into the Hall of Fame and deservedly so. if his career is over tomorrow then I say no, he wasn't "that" great to get into the Hall over a short career, but my projection is that he'll be a 70 or so point guy for the rest of his career so coupled with what he did in Anaheim that's Hall material.


    Lanny McDonald - Just hear me out first. One Cup, 1006 career points in 1111 games. 500 goals. Second team all-star in '77 and '83. Career high in points: 98, 93, 90, 87, 85. 117 playoff games, 84 points.

    Verdict: Maybe I'm starting a controversy here, but this is my take on it. I'm not saying he shouldnt be in there but here's why he can be argued that he might be close. Twice he was in the top 10 in scoring, not bad. His prime was form '75-83. And there are some pretty impressive seasons there. but my knock is his seasons before and after that. I understand he was young from '73-75 and getting older from say '86-89 but he really had some sub par seasons those years. And that hurt his career overall stats. Also his playoff record is weak, he should have more than 84 points. But do a couple of famous playoff goals propel him into the HOF? In '78 he scored the OT game 7 winner against the heavily favoured Isels. Also in '89 he scored the "nail in the coffin" goal that put Calgary over motreal to win the Cup. But that was his only goal that playoffs. Sure he was 36 by then but still. I think the only thing that saves Lanny is what he did in Toronto. he did weel there. But he did well in calgary and Colorado too. He had 66 goals in '83. But his best years were as a Leaf. I like Lanny and dont make a big fuss over him being in there, but its close IMO, much like Steve Shutt.


    John Leclair - One Cup, First all-star in '95, '98, Second all-star in '96, '97, '99. Scored 51, 50, 51 goals in a row. Also had seasons of 43, 40. Career high of 97 points, twice.

    Verdict: Leclair is 36 years old now and watching him this year I can be sure that a 50 goal season is much behind him. He couldnt even crack team USA. He might get 40 points this year. So its his prime that will have to save him. He did have a very good prime from '95-00. now ask yoursefl this what did it coincide with? Eric Lindros. Yes Leclair was a power forward himself but form the moment he came to Philly Lindros catapulted him to superstardom. the difference between him and sya Steve Shutt is that we saw what Leclair is like without Lindros. He's been very average since '00. That and Shutt had good playoff stats, Lecalir does not. he won a Cup with the Habs in '93 and scored two very big goals in the finals both in OT, but other than in '97 he's never not once had a very good playoff. Leclair is not as good as Rick Martin or Glenn Anderson, and both of them have the stigma attached to them that they had a centre who made them who they are. Unfortunatley Leclair without Lindros is no better than a 50 point man.
     
  2. reckoning

    reckoning Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    6,224
    Likes Received:
    95
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Oates: Obviously yes. I honestly can`t see how anyone could question his Hall-worthiness.

    Suter: No, not even close. There`s several defencemen far better than Suter who didn`t get in.

    Kariya: Too early to tell.

    McDonald: Yes. If anything he`s underrated; rare for a Leaf.

    LeClair: Looking closely at his career, it`s a closer call than I thought it would be but the answer is still no. Especially if Lindros doesn`t get in.
     
  3. John Flyers Fan

    John Flyers Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,416
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Yes to Oates, no to the rest.

    I thought Kariya was overrated when he was at his peak, and even that didn't last long enough.

    LeClair - never was a big playoff performer in Philadelphia.

    Suter - very good player, but about 3 notches below Mark Howe who still hasn't been inducted.
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2005
  4. VanIslander

    VanIslander Don't waste my time

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2004
    Messages:
    26,992
    Likes Received:
    1,464
    Trophy Points:
    170
    There should be a highlight video of his career. He was an incredible passer, simply outstanding, and he was excellent in the face-off too. If you haven't seen Adam Oates play much you are missing out on one of the geniuses of the game. Seriously.

    I share your verdict, but more emphatically: No, no and no!

    The guy can't even make the Olympic squad!! No HHOF yet. He needs to do much more. He seriously needs a major individual award like the Hart or Conn Smythe or something other than a lady Byng. And a Stanley Cup would help.

    I never understood why he was so over appreciated. But then again, I've never been a Flames or Leafs fan either.

    Needs to have success on a Stanley Cup run. Not yet.


    .... gee, i guess we agree, after all!
     
  5. canucksfan

    canucksfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2002
    Messages:
    33,674
    Likes Received:
    267
    Trophy Points:
    199
    Location:
    British Columbia
    Home Page:
    Oates is the only one from that list.
     
  6. Bring Back Bucky

    Bring Back Bucky Registered User

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    7,940
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Occupation:
    Hamster Trainer
    Location:
    Delicieux!
    What he said
     
  7. 12# Peter Bondra

    12# Peter Bondra Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2004
    Messages:
    8,688
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Only Oates off that list is HOF material.
     
  8. God Bless Canada

    God Bless Canada Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Newspaper reporter
    Location:
    Bentley reunion
    Oates is a mortal lock. Like Larionov, Oates won't get in on the first ballot in 2007 due to recent changes in Hall voting criteria (Messier, Francis, MacInnis and Stevens are the Class of 2007). But Oates and Igor are both gimmies for 2008. Oates was not only a world-class passer, but he was a solid defender and a wizard in the face-off circle. He was one of the best playmaking centres in the league until his late 30s. The only blight on his resume is a lack of playoff success (he had some post-season stinkers), but his regular season resume and all-round play are enough to get him in.

    MacDonald is a guy who most believe earned his place in the Hall. It didn't hurt that our last on-ice memory of him was very, very good, and he was a class act off the ice (won the first-ever King Clancy Trophy). He had some pretty good post-seasons. I've never had a problem with his place in the Hall.

    Suter? No. Randy Carlyle and Doug Wilson were both better defencemen, and they aren't in the Hall. Suter was a highly-skilled defenceman with a mean streak, but there are probably 10 defencemen better than him who aren't in the Hall, and aren't going to make it.

    Kariya? No. Doesn't have anything that stands out beyond his 25th birthday. Even when the Ducks went to the Cup final in 2003, he really wasn't that good. Injuries have played a role in his decline, but he only has three really impressive years. More players did more and aren't in the Hall. Kariya has had a good bounce-back year for Nashville, but I can still name five LW's better than him this year.

    Leclair? I think he's more Hall-worthy than Kariya, but he still doesn't make the grade. To say he's a 50-point LW without Lindros is erroneous. Keep in mind that LeClair still consistently produced even when Lindros was missing his 20 games per season. A big, strong winger who scored lots of goals and played a physical, but clean game. LeClair can play on my team any time, but he's not in the HHOF. Only a five-year prime.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"