In light of
@NoDak's post
several spots above, wouldn't Indiana University & its new arena have to enter the serious side of this conversation?
You probably know more than me JMC since I don't got a clue with IU. Indiana always seemed like a weird state to me, because all the States around it are hockey hotbeds and Indiana has produced NHL calibre players. However, as Minnesota is to youth hockey and Texas is to youth throwball, Indiana has its youth basketball and I think that sport dominates the culture there. Perhaps I am wrong, but from the Big 10 schools I think the ones who are the least likely to ever put in the resources, funds, or even have basic passion for the game is Northwestern, Purdue, and then Indiana in that order.
We also have to realise and what mk said above, just because a school is investing in an arena doesn't really mean much. Of course it is a HUGE step, but we can't say that all the teams who get an arena will eventually get DI teams...it just doesn't work that way.
Maybe they will surprise me, but Northwestern isn't a very sports orientated school; similar to the military schools they're just something for players to conduct during academic life. This differs to others where players who go to schools like Ohio State or Michigan for that matter still have a dream for the NBA, NFL, or NHL. They're going because they have good sports programmes and can develop into a better player with the specific coach at the helm. You don't go to Northwestern to try and make the NFL, you go to become a lawyer, researcher, or some other graduate school degree. Plus they have a insanely low enrol;ment since they're a private school. Purdue, has never ever shown any passion for hockey and if a school never has any passion then it won't get any further than a dream, and finally as I mentioned above Indiana is a huge basketball state and that might disrupt the chances of getting hockey.
I do think Iowa, Maryland, and Iowa State will get hockey within some time, especially considering that it's getting more popular on the national spectrum even if it is at a snails pace. Rutgers has shown that they want hockey even if the funds are not quite there yet. The weird one is Nebraska and a lot of alumni want to see it happen even though a large donor hasn't come out yet.
What really needs to happen is we need Illinois to start a programme without a financially heavy donor like Pegula. I am not that Illinois need to start the entire team from just their academic funds, but some charity events can help kickstart the foundational process. If they're able to start without a donor, then that blueprint can potentially be a gateway for other teams to copy and use to try and get a DI team.