HFBoards Top 50 Prospects Ranking #38 (closed)

[amnesiac]

TOP 50 PROSPECTS


Criteria is 22 and under, 30 NHL GP or less, no goalies

1. Owen Power - D		18. Alexander Holtz - RW		35. Danila Yurov - RW
2. Matty Beniers - C		19. Brandt Clarke - D		36. Joakim Kemell - RW
3. Jake Sanderson - D		20. John Peterka - LW		37. Dylan Holloway - C
4. Luke Hughes - D		21. Dylan Guenther - RW		38.
5. Juraj Slafkovsky - LW		22. Lukas Reichel - C/W		39.
6. Shane Wright - C		23. Cutter Gauthier - C/LW		40.
7. Simon Edvinsson - D		24. Matthew Savoie - C		41.
8. Mason McTavish - C		25. Marco Kasper - C		42.
9. Jack Quinn - W		26. Frank Nazar - C		43.
10. Logan Cooley - C		27. Kaiden Guhle - D		44.
11. Simon Nemec - D		28. Logan Stankoven - C		45.
12. Kent Johnson - C		29. Jakob Pelletier - LW		46.
13. David Jiricek - D		30. Maverick Bourque - C		47.
14. Wyatt Johnston - C		31. Pavel Mintyukov - D		48.
15. Marco Rossi - C		32. Olen Zellweger - D		49.
16. Cole Perfetti - C/RW		33. Aatu Raty - C		50.
17. William Eklund - LW		34. Thomas Bordeleau - C

To add:
Rutger McGroarty - C
Isaac Howard - LW
Brad Lambert - C/RW
Ivan Miroshinchenko - LW

Zachary Bolduc - C
Lukas Cormier - D
Calen Addison - D
Jake Neighbours - LW
Nikita Chibrikov - RW
Carson Lambos - D
Fedor Svechkov - C
Jack Rathbone - D
Jordan Harris - D
Ville Heinola - D
Sakir Mukhamadullin - D
Zachary L'Heureux - LW
Jordan Spence - D
Jacob Perrault - RW
Zac Jones - D
William Dufour - RW
Sean Farrell - LW




Past lists:
HFBoards TOP 50 Prospects Ranking #50 FINAL (summer 2021)
HFBoards TOP 75 Prospects Ranking #75 (FINAL) (winter 2020-21)
HFBoards TOP 50 Prospects (summer 2019)
Top 50 Drafted Prospects 2018: #46 - #50 (summer 2018)
HFBoards TOP 50 Prospects #50 FINAL (summer 2017)

Click to read more...

 

[North Cole]

Weird to see Holloway over Broberg

 

[Lavar Ball]

Weird to see Holloway over Broberg

Why is that, Holloway won the Oilers prospect poll too

 

[Kcb12345]

People are gonna be surprised by how good Bourgault is. Severely underrated around here. I also like Lysell and even Östlund here, but would probably have them after Bourgault

 

[GermanSpitfire]

Pinto, Maccelli, Marchenko are some of my favourites at this point.

 

[Favin]

Kravtsov AINEC

(Just kidding...voted for Marchenko)

 

[EdJovanovski]

Kravtsov AINEC

 

[Haatley]

PLAYER 1
USHL YR 2 - 44 GP - 17 G - 25 A - 42 PTS
NCAA YR 1 - 33 GP - 15 G - 18 A - 33 PTS

PLAYER 2
USHL YR 2 - 51 GP - 48 G - 37 A - 85 PTS
NCAA YR 1 - 34 GP - 18 G - 18 A - 36 PTS

Which player is better?
Not even posting the lopsided WJC totals.

 

[chaosrevolver]

PLAYER 1
USHL YR 2 - 44 GP - 17 G - 25 A - 42 PTS
NCAA YR 1 - 33 GP - 15 G - 18 A - 33 PTS

PLAYER 2
USHL YR 2 - 51 GP - 48 G - 37 A - 85 PTS
NCAA YR 1 - 34 GP - 18 G - 18 A - 36 PTS

Which player is better?
Not even posting the lopsided WJC totals.

Looks like their NCAA YR1 is pretty similar and I'd say that's the more relevant line.

Also this isn't how you decide whether someone is better.

 

[Tufted Titmouse]

PLAYER 1
USHL YR 2 - 44 GP - 17 G - 25 A - 42 PTS
NCAA YR 1 - 33 GP - 15 G - 18 A - 33 PTS

PLAYER 2
USHL YR 2 - 51 GP - 48 G - 37 A - 85 PTS
NCAA YR 1 - 34 GP - 18 G - 18 A - 36 PTS

Which player is better?
Not even posting the lopsided WJC totals.

Knies

 

[RedWingzz]

Berggren was voted 41 last year. He had an AHL season comparable to Jakob Pelletier (who was voted 29th). He had 64 pts in 71 AHL games as a 21 year old.

 

[Haatley]

Looks like their NCAA YR1 is pretty similar and I'd say that's the more relevant line.

Also this isn't how you decide whether someone is better.

Oh... you mean... literally being better at every step, and playing on the same line at WJCs where one was arguably the best player on the team and the other was invisible isn't how you tell?

 

[Tkachuk Norris]

Berggren was voted 41 last year. He had an AHL season comparable to Jakob Pelletier (who was voted 29th). He had 64 pts in 71 AHL games as a 21 year old.

Jakob was a) the captain of the best team in Q two years in a row - on different teams b) a two way stud and arguably the best skater on one of the best teams in the AHL, AHL second team all star. c) Canada’s best forward at the WJC after Krebs and Cozens. I’d say it was him and Newhook that were next best on that pretty stacked team. Other guys from that team were considered top 20 prospects league . Yet Jakob significantly outplayed them in that tourney. d) he’s almost a year younger than Berggren and didn’t have any pro experience heading into this season.

Berggren should be in contention for top 50 but I’m not sure he’s a shoe in.

 

[JeffreyLFC]

Pinto all day, everyday!

 

[RedWingzz]

Jakob was a) the captain of the best team in Q two years in a row - on different teams b) a two way stud and arguably the best skater on one of the best teams in the AHL, AHL second team all star. c) Canada’s best forward at the WJC after Krebs and Cozens. I’d say it was him and Newhook that were next best on that pretty stacked team. Other guys from that team were considered top 20 prospects league . Yet Jakob significantly outplayed them in that tourney. d) he’s almost a year younger than Berggren and didn’t have any pro experience heading into this season.

Berggren should be in contention for top 50 but I’m not sure he’s a shoe in.

Berggren put up 45 pts in 49 games for Skelleftea as a 20 year old and followed it up with 64 pts in 71 games in the AHL as a 21 year old. My point remains valid though, he had similar production to Pelletier in the A this past season, and yes he's a bit older (7 and a half months, not a year).

Also since you brought up Pelletier at the WJC, Berggren put up a respectable 5 pts in 7 games at the WJC.

In no way am I saying Pelletier is a bad prospect, because he's not, I like Pelletier. I'm just saying if Pelletier was voted at 29, Berggren shouldn't be too much further down the list. They play similar games, both skilled wingers that are capable of putting up points. If you asked me right now who will have the better career between the 2, it's pretty much a coin flip.

 

[Stewie Griffin]

Coronato
Lekkerimaki
Korchinski

 

[Eegs]

Pinto again for me.

 

[Tufted Titmouse]

Oh... you mean... literally being better at every step, and playing on the same line at WJCs where one was arguably the best player on the team and the other was invisible isn't how you tell?

Is there a reason you are whining about a player in every thread, who is usually 4th-8th in votes? Does it worry you that much that he might fall into the top 50? lol

He hasn't even come close to winning a poll and yet you've tried to make every thread about him.

 

[Haatley]

Is there a reason you are whining about a player in every thread, who is usually 4th-8th in votes? Does it worry you that much that he might fall into the top 50? lol

He hasn't even come close to winning a poll and yet you've tried to make every thread about him.

He hasn't come close to winning a poll yet you have voted for him in the last 20.

What does that say?

 

[Zegs2sendhelp]

Everyone sleeping on Jacob perreault

But seriously

Faber for me, not a sexy player but better than he’ll get ranked

 

[MNRube]

Faber, Pinto, Korchinski in that order for me.

 

[GermanSpitfire]

Everyone sleeping on Jacob perreault

But seriously

Faber for me, not a sexy player but better than he’ll get ranked

I agree on Perreault

And Faber is similar to a Pelech, or Cernak in that they aren’t truly appreciated as prospects because they don’t have fantastic offensive numbers.

 

[Tufted Titmouse]

He hasn't come close to winning a poll yet you have voted for him in the last 20.

What does that say?

That I am a homer and like my guy?

For the record, I voted for him in the last 3 polls...is that really that absurd considering how close these kids are at this point? In my opinion, actively campaigning against the prospect of a team I don't like is far more absurd.

 

[chaosrevolver]

Oh... you mean... literally being better at every step, and playing on the same line at WJCs where one was arguably the best player on the team and the other was invisible isn't how you tell?

All you showed was baseless stats.

These don't show defensive impact, physicality, team quality, etc. They don't show a players skills. They show one guy had far more points in USHL and that they were pretty comparable in NCAA first year.

I honestly didn't even know which player each was (I see now Knies was the one).

 

[Haatley]

All you showed was baseless stats.

These don't show defensive impact, physicality, team quality, etc. They don't show a players skills. They show one guy had far more points in USHL and that they were pretty comparable in NCAA first year.

I honestly didn't even know which player each was (I see now Knies was the one).

Okay. So I guess I can say Matthew Tkachuk is better than Auston Matthews cause goal scoring means nothing. When it comes down to defensive impact and physicality, Tkachuk>

Right?