Toggle sidebar

HF GM Games Fantasy Mock Draft #3 - Discussion II

Status
Not open for further replies.
m0pe

m0pe

Registered User
Feb 24, 2020
4,284
4,711
Lucbourdon said:
If you don't mind, can you go more into detail.
I really wanted to create a well balanced machine this time around, I feel much more confident this time around.
But i wanna hear opinions of course!
Click to expand...

yeah sure.

I mean Olofsson knows how to finish next to elite C's as he clearly showed this year. Mac and him would probably score a ton together and both be lethal on the top PP. You don't need some elite RW to make this line work.

I don't love Monohan as a defensive player, but he provides a lot of scoring. Toffoli provides a great two-way game, but if you want to really make this a good two-way line, get a strong playmaking/defensive LW to compliment them.

Brodin is just very good in the complimetary #2 role (or anchoring 2nd pair). Doughty has fallen off, but in the right situation I am sure he would bounce back some. Get some more offence on the D group behind them and you will have a good looking team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canucks LB
Panda Bear

Panda Bear

Registered User
Apr 2, 2010
6,590
5,732
All players are on a list, so in a way, they're all Panda approved. Vatanen is 175 overall, 44 for D. Have yet to adjust zone entry denials, but he's mad underrated

@Exquisite did me a solid and nailed the choices with Palmieri there too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Exquisite
Canucks LB

Canucks LB

My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
Oct 12, 2008
76,900
29,658
m0pe said:
yeah sure.

I mean Olofsson knows how to finish next to elite C's as he clearly showed this year. Mac and him would probably score a ton together and both be lethal on the top PP. You don't need some elite RW to make this line work.

I don't love Monohan as a defensive player, but he provides a lot of scoring. Toffoli provides a great two-way game, but if you want to really make this a good two-way line, get a strong playmaking/defensive LW to compliment them.

Brodin is just very good in the complimetary #2 role (or anchoring 2nd pair). Doughty has fallen off, but in the right situation I am sure he would bounce back some. Get some more offence on the D group behind them and you will have a good looking team.
Click to expand...
Bertuzzi is the guy I finished up on my second line. Pretty good fit I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m0pe
Exquisite

Exquisite

Registered User
Feb 9, 2016
1,059
204
Panda Bear said:
All players are on a list, so in a way, they're all Panda approved. Vatanen is 175 overall, 44 for D. Have yet to adjust zone entry denials, but he's mad underrated

@Exquisite did me a solid and nailed the choices with Palmieri there too.
Click to expand...

to be fair I just picked the highest available players on your 27,584 player list
 
Canucks LB

Canucks LB

My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
Oct 12, 2008
76,900
29,658
Makaveli said:
I’m in the same boat, forgot I can’t make another pick trade
Click to expand...
I made the same mistake.
I actually Dm'd LV earlier in the draft asking to change it to 4 picks, just for flexibility, he respectfully said, can't change rules mid game.
Fair enough!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makaveli
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom