vanlady said:OK so how is a cap going to work? Remember the NFL had meaningful revenue sharing since 1965, long before there cap. The NBA has better revenue sharing. The NHL owners don't want revenue sharing above 10%, which is a joke. Without revenue sharing a cap won't work.
wow you contiunually put numbers to things when those numbers have never been mentioned.
And again most people believe that significant revenue sharing is a necessary for any system...hard cap or soft cap.
You have no clue what the owners are willing to conceed for revenue sharing. The NHLPA believes a significant luxury tax will get owners thinking...guess what a significant luxury tax is significant revenue sharing! Why would that get them thinking and get them back to the table? In return for that significant sharing the players have to give something other than the usual selling the younger players off and that's tying any sort of tax threshold to revenues.