NewHabsEra*
Guest
He could be top 3 in terms of compete level .
Huh, no. Wouldnt even crack our top 20 prospects based on compete level alone.
He could be top 3 in terms of compete level .
Pretty much everyone had Grigorenko in the top three (behind Yakupov, and very closely tied with Galchenyuk) heading into the 2012 draft...it was a huge shock when he and Forsberg (consensus #4) dropped as low as they did.
2012 was a highly unusual draft class...it's otherwise unheard of for 8 of the top 10 spots to go to defensemen.
Of all our prospects, Reway seems to draw the greatest disagreement level from scouts.
Huh, no. Wouldnt even crack our top 20 prospects based on compete level alone.
Agreed, at least in the defensive zone, his compete level is not that high. I've seen him stop skating a bunch of times. I have a lot of concerns over his play but I'd also say he's one of the funniest prospects to watch play a game.
In the offensive zone I find his compete level to be extremely good. He may not be solid in the defensive end, but he's not a defensive player or really drafted to be a two-way guy.
If Reway succeeds in becoming an NHL force, a lot of scouts will truly rue the fact he slipped through to the Habs in the 4th round 116th OV, after playing in NA in the QMJHL for all to see.
Jamie Benn, who won an Art Ross last year, is possibly the most successful fourth round draft pick in NHL history.
I hear this opinion alot but it simply doesn't work that way. Every player is expected to be atleast competent defensively. Players that are allowed to ignore their defensive responsiblities play for losing clubs.
Exactly. Not every player is expected to be a Gilmour (two-way), Kirk Muller (two-way), but...not putting any effort defensively is like giving the finger to your teammates who do put the effort.
You have to put some effort...you can't stop skating when it's time to put some defensive effort. Losing clubs have a lot of those players (or I assume so). It's a losing mentality.
p.s.: of course there's the offensive player who is given TWO two-way forwards to play with to balance out the line, but still...Reway has to give some effort defensively, even though he's a very gifted offensive player. You do it for the team, you do it to win.
I hear this opinion alot but it simply doesn't work that way. Every player is expected to be atleast competent defensively. Players that are allowed to ignore their defensive responsiblities play for losing clubs.
I definitely agree, and I don't think he'll be great defensively but I think he'll be competent enough defensively that if he makes the NHL his offense will make up for his average defensive play, by the time he makes it if he does.
I also wouldn't say he completely ignores his defensive responsibilities. Rather, he's played more-so in an offensive role for the most part. Shame we can't get him on our AHL club so he could improve in that area but I think two-way play is simply something that can be improved over time, especially with young players.
He'll never be Patrice Bergeron, but if he can be competent defensively while still being competitive in the offensive zone I think he could be a good player.
I think it is ridiculous that McCarron is that low and Hudon is not a better prospect than Scherbak IMO....
Top 10 des espoirs des Canadiens
1-Charles Hudon
2-Noah Juulsen
3-Nikita Scherbak
4-Martin Reway
5-Artturi Lehkonen
6-Jarred Tinordi
7-Zachary Fucale
8-Sven Andrighetto
9-Jérémy Grégoire
10-Michael McCarron
Pronman had a good call on Lehkonen at 5, would not have put him that high although McCarron at 10 was a joke at the time and looks terrible now. Gregoire has not impressed at all in the AHL so far. Still shocked that someone had Hudon ranked at #1 and I've been a big fan of his since his junior days.
Jamie Benn, who won an Art Ross last year, is possibly the most successful fourth round draft pick in NHL history.
Jamie Benn, who won an Art Ross last year, is possibly the most successful fourth round draft pick in NHL history.
Same as Gallagher
How would you rank our prospects ? Do you have any chance to see Lehknonen or Reway ?Pronman had a good call on Lehkonen at 5, would not have put him that high although McCarron at 10 was a joke at the time and looks terrible now. Gregoire has not impressed at all in the AHL so far. Still shocked that someone had Hudon ranked at #1 and I've been a big fan of his since his junior days.
I think Fucale deserves a spot in our top 10, not sure where but aside from that one rough game vs. the Marlies he's put up a very good record at 7-2-2 and his stats would look pretty solid if you don't factor in that game.
My current top 10
1- McCarron - He's been great in the last 2 years. He could become a great replacement for Plekanec when he leaves.
2- Scherbak - Not a great start to his AHL career, but is not at 100% and I still think he can be a top 6 player. Once he gets back to 100%, he might go back to #1.
3- Hudon - Great vision and abilities. Really hopes he gets a shot in the top 6 this year or out of camp next year.
4- Juulsen - His offensive numbers aren't there this year, but his team is the lowest scoring team and apparently he is dominant defensively. D with the most upside in the system.
5- Lekhonen - Hasn't had the most spotlight of the prospects, but he is doing remarkably well. Should be an interesting guy to keep an eye on in the next camp.
6- Andrighetto - We are seeing what he brings in the NHL right now. Don't think he gets sent down again.
7- Fucale - Had his ups and downs but is doing well in the AHL.
8- De la Rose - Has showed he can play in the NHL, but is having a disappointing season in the AHL. He is still young and people seem to forget that.
9- Reway - Offense, offense, offense. Boom or bust. Will have a better idea once he actually comes to camp (if he ever does).
10- Lernout - Brings something Tinordi was supposed to bring. Big, nasty D with some puck moving and skating abilities.
HM- Addison - I don't what it is about him, but I just like him. Probably a bottom line guy at best, but I still like his speed and compete.