MasterD
Giggidy Giggidy Goo
- Jul 1, 2004
- 5,626
- 5,006
Dunno. But I'm pretty sure he'd take a stint in Montreal if he had the opportunity.Didn’t Hartley say he would retire after his contract with Omsk comes to an end ?
Unless I’m mistaken.
Dunno. But I'm pretty sure he'd take a stint in Montreal if he had the opportunity.Didn’t Hartley say he would retire after his contract with Omsk comes to an end ?
Unless I’m mistaken.
Would you like some cheese with your "whine". Wow some people complain about anything.How is a thread, with a title like this, allowed to stay up? This is someone’s personal musing, nothing to support it, just some random opinion with zero based in fact. I’ve seen things taken down with much more content than these “thoughts.”
Would you like some cheese with your "whine". Wow some people complain about anything.
a coach at this level (and it is about time) is all about managing personalities, and optimizing talent. Nothing to do with "systems".. NHL players can play any system, and quite frankly systems are easily thrown out the window with how fast this game is, and depending on score.Coaches are evaluated a little too much on team success. Some guys get respect because they were able to choose to go to good teams, some guys are not because they went to bad teams that couldn't win with any coach. I suspect that only a few coaches have a significant positive impact.
a coach at this level (and it is about time) is all about managing personalities, and optimizing talent. Nothing to do with "systems".. NHL players can play any system, and quite frankly systems are easily thrown out the window with how fast this game is, and depending on score.
they key is to identify IQs of players, and their ability to handle certain situations. While skill is visible, it's the IQ that makes a player great. name me one player in the past 30 years who finished top 10 in scoring, and is dumb as a doorknob. while it is very easy to find 4th liners who have skill but no brains.
This has held true for NFL QBs for a while now. the perfect example of how skill means nothing is they dont know how to "read" the game. I say Hockey players must have the same IQ as QBs. 120+ should be minimum. and we all "know" that doorknob from our junior years... full of talent, but so dumb.
Thanks. You should look up speculation in the dictionary - or have you already been there and done that
He's one of his generation that doesn't look like a dinosaur. He won the Cup once, he won the russian Cup and he looks like he's a good person.Dunno. But I'm pretty sure he'd take a stint in Montreal if he had the opportunity.
a coach at this level (and it is about time) is all about managing personalities, and optimizing talent. Nothing to do with "systems".. NHL players can play any system, and quite frankly systems are easily thrown out the window with how fast this game is, and depending on score.
they key is to identify IQs of players, and their ability to handle certain situations. While skill is visible, it's the IQ that makes a player great. name me one player in the past 30 years who finished top 10 in scoring, and is dumb as a doorknob. while it is very easy to find 4th liners who have skill but no brains.
This has held true for NFL QBs for a while now. the perfect example of how skill means nothing is they dont know how to "read" the game. I say Hockey players must have the same IQ as QBs. 120+ should be minimum. and we all "know" that doorknob from our junior years... full of talent, but so dumb.
I'm not sure IQ tests are based off of classroom education like SATs, etc.. but the speed of hockey with myriad variables make it so level of intelligence plays a huge role. I "assume" scouts are looking for this, but Im not sure to what extent - especially if said "scouts" are just rink rats and look for players who "stay" longer after practice etc..I doubt ability to play hockey and read plays tracks with, say, studying physics even though the hockey player ends up doing a lot of unconscious calculus and physics.
Teams play different systems. Therrien’s teams always started fast because he kept it simple. They would win games until other teams worked out their more complicated but more effective systems and then they’d be just OK.
and I would argue that Ovy is highly intelligent (when not drunk).. I really don't know TB or TdA well enough to form an opinion..Alex Ovechkin, Tyler Bertuzzi, Tony DeAngelo whom all have great start this year.
I'm not sure IQ tests are based off of classroom education like SATs, etc.. but the speed of hockey with myriad variables make it so level of intelligence plays a huge role. I "assume" scouts are looking for this, but Im not sure to what extent - especially if said "scouts" are just rink rats and look for players who "stay" longer after practice etc..
the QB example is perfect for hockey players. And while I advocate for smarts (always) it doesn't mean that is the only asset - otherwise every Harvard player would be a star.. There is a difference btw book smart and ice smart, but either way IQ will generally be statistically correct over the course of a career. Only trouble is figuring out Russians (draft eligible). I'd venture a guess that Yakupov had a sub 100 IQ..
and I would argue that Ovy is highly intelligent (when not drunk).. I really don't know TB or TdA well enough to form an opinion..
I dont agree.. Russians throw a curve ball. yeah he's missing a tooth lol, but that doesnt mean he's dumb.. Dude scores on command - you need massive smarts to be a pure goal scorer in hockey.I once watch a poker tournement with Ovi in and trust me that guy is dumb.