LeBrun: Guentzel: Pens want prospects over picks - Carolina favorite

Status
Not open for further replies.

UrbanImpact

Registered User
Apr 12, 2021
4,083
6,136
I’m kind of surprised we (Canucks) are in on him. I understand the Pittsburgh connection but we already got Lindholm. Are we really going to get the two top rental forwards? At what cost? What about helping the defence instead?

I’m guessing if we got Guentzel they’d re-sign him by giving him a blank cheque for 8 years which is annoying. We don’t need more 30 year olds on long term deals.
Why dont we need anymore 30 yrs olds on long term deals?

The Canucks have ONE 30 yr old on a long term deal and he is on pace for 108 pts.
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
40,830
19,063
Carolina has the better assets than any of those teams and if their management had an ounce of balls he would’ve been a Hurricane by now.
Guentzel for Necas with the assumption Jake would like to resign there. Adding Guentzel to the top 6 would make them quite formidable in the East.

we like to wait until the very last second to try and get the best deal possible.
Which only works if it's only two teams talking. With 6, someone will pay the price to get the guy.
 

UrbanImpact

Registered User
Apr 12, 2021
4,083
6,136
I don’t think the Oilers can afford to sign him, which may take a few teams out that don’t want to pony up that much for what would be a pure rental.

I think the Oilers are out because Geuntzel has likely indicated that he wont re-sign there long term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Artemi Panarin

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
24,194
39,864
colorado
Visit site
The report was that they wanted 2 prospects over 2 picks, but I think picks would also be included.

Bringing my post from the other Guentzel thread, these are my expectations for a rental Guentzel trade with some of the rumored teams:

-Vegas: Brisson, Korczak and a 2024 2nd
-Carolina: Nadeau, Koivunen and a 2024 2nd
-Vancouver: Hoglander, Raty and a 2025 1st
-Florida: Samoskevich, Sawchyn and a 2025 2nd
Arguably the two best offensive prospects for the Canes? Bold. Also unlikely.
 

Ulf5

Registered User
Feb 21, 2017
1,040
762
I think the Oilers are out because Geuntzel has likely indicated that he wont re-sign there long term.
Maybe if they think they can't re-sign both the big dogs they take their shot now? Damn the consequences.
 

TheDawnOfANewTage

Dahlin, it’ll all be fine
Dec 17, 2018
12,413
18,164
I bet he goes to Vegas

I see what u did thur.

But also yes. They’ll find some weird loophole where they can trade options on Stone’s future production + conditional conditional picks, or something.

“The Knights trade the estate of Robin Lehner’s snake farm to the Penguins..”
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
81,910
80,094
Redmond, WA
Arguably the two best offensive prospects for the Canes? Bold. Also unlikely.

I mean, what do you think a 40 goal, PPG winger with a terrific playoff track record goes for?

This isn't asking for a Lekkerimaki or Jarvis level asset. A B+ prospect, a B prospect and a 2nd for a rental Guentzel is entirely reasonable.

The Vancouver offer seems to be more valuable than the other offers you wrote

I don't think it is. It's entirely aligned with the Vegas deal in my eyes. Hoglander and Brisson are a wash and Korczak is a better prospect than Raty IMO, so the Canucks need to add a 2025 1st but Vegas would be fine with a 2024 2nd.
 

BHawk21

Registered User
Mar 21, 2022
1,943
1,171
hes a perfect fit for Carolina.

This would give them more options in the offseason with the RFAs as well if they can/want to resign.
 

Snuggs

Registered User
Jun 24, 2018
2,309
1,104
Just keep thinking Carolina/Winnipeg. Both teams need to try to win this year, imo.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
81,910
80,094
Redmond, WA
As a rental, Taylor Hall was traded for Bahl, Merkley, Schnarr, a 2020 1st and a 2021 3rd back in the 2019-2020 season. He was traded mid-way through the year, so I definitely think that benefitted his value, but I also don't know why Guentzel would bring back dramatically less than that.

That Hall return looks roughly the value of a B+ prospect, a B prospect, a 1st and a 3rd. I don't see why Guentzel brings back much less than that. Downgrading the 1st to a 2nd or getting rid of the 3rd seems to be a good way to account for Hall being traded with 40 games left compared to 20 games left for Guentzel.
 

UrbanImpact

Registered User
Apr 12, 2021
4,083
6,136
I mean, what do you think a 40 goal, PPG winger with a terrific playoff track record goes for?

This isn't asking for a Lekkerimaki or Jarvis level asset. A B+ prospect, a B prospect and a 2nd for a rental Guentzel is entirely reasonable.



I don't think it is. It's entirely aligned with the Vegas deal in my eyes. Hoglander and Brisson are a wash and Korczak is a better prospect than Raty IMO, so the Canucks need to add a 2025 1st but Vegas would be fine with a 2024 2nd.

Canucks arent giving 2 first round value ( Hoglander, 2025 1st) for Geuntzel plus one of their top 5 prospects (Raty)

If Hoglander is included in the deal it will be

Hoglander, 3rd and 5th for Guentzel
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
81,910
80,094
Redmond, WA
Canucks arent giving 2 first round value ( Hoglander, 2025 1st) for Geuntzel plus one of their top 5 prospects (Raty)

If Hoglander is included in the deal it will be

Hoglander, 3rd and 5th for Guentzel

Okay then you won't get him. Good talk.

I like how in a thread stating that there are 6+ teams in on Guentzel, Canucks fans are still in here trying to lowball Penguins fans and acting like they're the only team in on Guentzel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad