DerekKingSnipes
Registered User
Why can’t they do bothI’d rather fire Lambert than trade for Hanifin
Why can’t they do bothI’d rather fire Lambert than trade for Hanifin
An Evason hire + Hanifin trade has this team second in the Metro come TDLWhy can’t they do both
I’d rather Gallant over EvasonAn Evason hire + Hanifin trade has this team second in the Metro come TDL
I like Dobson better than Bedard. We never got to see Bedard's full potential but I still think Dobson is and certainly will be better. I actually never could watch Chara as a youngster with the Isles because I had left the Island by that point and technology hadn't caught up yet but I would obviously not go there with Dobson. That's rarified air!Bryan Berard was the #1 overall pick
And we did draft Chara . . late bloomer but 1st yeqr eligible likely HOF.
Man it's painful to see what Toews has become. To think that of all the defenseman Garf drafted Toews would turn out to be the best and that we would basically be forced to get rid of him just kills me!I think Bryan Berard had a lot of potential. Jeff Norton had a lot of potential. Vladimir Malakhov had a lot of potential. And we had Devon Toews, who is a rich man now.
No chance for me. Gallant wont last 2 years.I’d rather Gallant over Evason
Evason gets the Sharks job when they need to get rid of Quinn.... Isles have to go bigger than that like Sutter, because the window is narrow.An Evason hire + Hanifin trade has this team second in the Metro come TDL
I think the lesson there is simply if you need to shed salary it can't be from the blue line, our blue line depreciated with Leddy gone and then Toews, and we have been hoping Aho would become one of the them and he is just a less intelligent Thomas HickeyI like Dobson better than Bedard. We never got to see Bedard's full potential but I still think Dobson is and certainly will be better. I actually never could watch Chara as a youngster with the Isles because I had left the Island by that point and technology hadn't caught up yet but I would obviously not go there with Dobson. That's rarified air!
Man it's painful to see what Toews has become. To think that of all the defenseman Garf drafted Toews would turn out to be the best and that we would basically be forced to get rid of him just kills me!
He’s barely accomplished more than Lambert, he’s like 8-14 in the playoffs with 3 first round exits.Evason is going to get hired anyways
Do you see what he did with the wild the last few years? The roster wasn’t spectacular and he had them as 100pt teams. Lambert has never.He’s barely accomplished more than Lambert, he’s like 8-14 in the playoffs with 3 first round exits.
And basically set a pick on Jarvis without actually interferring!This is elite stuff from Dobson on the OT goal. Defends and breaks up the scoring chance and has the wherewithal to get up quick, move the puck up ice and also join the rush.
I feel the Brind’Amour Canes are the best at setting picks since the Babcock Red Wings.And basically set a pick on Jarvis without actually interferring!
I can't think of a player in the history of the NHL improved more from their debut to their peak than Chara. I did see him, and I can't imagine a player improving more that he did.I like Dobson better than Bedard. We never got to see Bedard's full potential but I still think Dobson is and certainly will be better. I actually never could watch Chara as a youngster with the Isles because I had left the Island by that point and technology hadn't caught up yet but I would obviously not go there with Dobson. That's rarified air!
Getting outshot 43-16 is downright embarassing. Landbert is worse than Capuano.
The 43 doesn’t bother me because the Hurricanes do that all the time. The shoot and shoot. It’s the 16 that bothers me. We don’t create much offense. It’s an old story.Getting outshot 43-16 is downright embarassing. Landbert is worse than Capuano.
If we are talking possible coaches, I like Boudreau. I know it would never happen, but it would certainly be interesting if Lou hired Patrick Roy.
I don't think Varlamov, at his age, can handle the 60% start workload. So I disagree there. But I don't think there's any question that Varlamov's positioning & anticipation have been better that Sorokin's.At this point, I dont see how there can be any dispute that Varly should be the number one goalie until proven otherwise. He has FAR outplayed Sorokin.
Yes they need to play Varly to settle things down and let Sorokin get his composure back. Good luck with Lambert seeing this.I don't think Varlamov, at his age, can handle the 60% start workload. So I disagree there. But I don't think there's any question that Varlamov's positioning & anticipation have been better that Sorokin's.