Not next year, but re-imagining if we went with him instead of Jones. We'd still have a 1st for starters.
How do you know?
Not next year, but re-imagining if we went with him instead of Jones. We'd still have a 1st for starters.
I agree with this. Reimer has been an excellent backup and I'd love it if he resigned with the Sharks for a reasonable price to stay the backup but Jones is and should be the number 1 going forward.Crazy how ppl are even speculating on Reimer taking the job but jones was maligned from day 1 because he cost a first but has looked better than Reimer in pretty much all technical aspects.
Reimer loses track of the puck, guys. You can see it. His side to side is slower (not by much) than jones and who knows where his rebounds are going to go.
Jones is younger, higher ceiling and less of a fix for coaches. I see two main problems with jones. Not cheating off the post and some adjustment to his overall focus.
No way do I move jones and keep Reimer.
Not next year, but re-imagining if we went with him instead of Jones. We'd still have a 1st for starters.
There's no way Reimer stays after this season. We would have trouble fitting him under the cap and we have people we need to re-sign going into next year that are going to get raises and are much more important. He was brought in as an insurance policy this season for Jones and he's doing a stellar job at that.
Not next year, but re-imagining if we went with him instead of Jones. We'd still have a 1st for starters.
How do you know?
Look deep into Marty's eyes and tell me again that he is not worth a 1st.
Well, I think there's a few reasons he might stay here that I went into in the trade thread for him just now. Not gonna retype it all here (go there if you want to read it, rofl), but I definitely think it's possible he stays, especially if he thinks a much better starter opportunity will open up in the 2017 offseason than the ones that will be available this one. (since I doubt he wants to play behind a dumpster fire again). So, I think it's certainly possible he'll sign a 1 year deal to stay here.
I didn't catch the game, was there any retaliation/antics with Domi?
I didn't catch the game, was there any retaliation/antics with Domi?
Not that I saw, was anybody expecting it? I wasn't.
Nah not really. Nurse on the other hand...I would like to see something honestly. Sharks need stand up more for each other when these things actually happen, it's been a problem for a while and the only player to really do it during the Thornton era has been Clowe (plus an occasional scrub/enforcer)
Nah not really. Nurse on the other hand...I would like to see something honestly. Sharks need to stand up more for each other when these things actually happen, it's been a problem for a while and the only player to really do it during the Thornton era has been Clowe (plus an occasional scrub/enforcer)
I think he's going to want to go somewhere where he can be a legit #1 starter and I don't think that's going to happen here. If he keeps playing well to close out the season, someone will be willing to give him some good money as well.
Personally, I think we could put our money in better places than on a backup/1B goaltender. I don't want to end up like Dallas and spending a ridiculous amount of money on a goalie tandem though I fully acknowledge that a Jones/Reimer tandem is far superior to Lehtonen/Niemi.
Oh sure, I would be surprised if he didn't want to go somewhere and be a starter, at least eventually. It's just that he finally got out of being the backstop to a terrible team in a really awful media environment. I am not so sure he is so anxious to be a starter RIGHT NOW that he'd leap at a chance to go back to such a negative situation and play goalie with a dumpster fire in front of him again. I think the main 2 teams that need starters this offseason are Carolina (really bad), and Calgary (bad this year for sure).
I honestly haven't researched what teams are going to likely be looking for a new starter in the 2017 offseason. I am sure he or his representatives have probably looked into that, though. So, if there is a particularly attractive opportunity that looks like it will open up in 2017, and he doesn't like any of the possible starter destinations this offseason, then I think there's a good chance he stays, at least on a 1-season contract.
Oh sure, I would be surprised if he didn't want to go somewhere and be a starter, at least eventually. It's just that he finally got out of being the backstop to a terrible team in a really awful media environment. I am not so sure he is so anxious to be a starter RIGHT NOW that he'd leap at a chance to go back to such a negative situation and play goalie with a dumpster fire in front of him again. I think the main 2 teams that need starters this offseason are Carolina (really bad), and Calgary (bad this year for sure), so neither one promises to be the greatest environment to play in.
I honestly haven't researched what teams are going to likely be looking for a new starter in the 2017 offseason. I am sure he or his representatives have probably looked into that, though. So, if there is a particularly attractive opportunity that looks like it will open up in 2017 and he doesn't like any of the possible starter destinations this offseason, then I think there's a good chance he stays, at least on a 1-season contract.
Because a player who's worth a 1st before the season isn't worth a 4th at the deadline.
Sure, but you never win a Cup if you pay fair value for everything.
Or they just humiliate the Oilers.
Thomas Vanek was moved for a 1st round pick, later in the same year wasn't able to get NYI a 1st.
Why not both?
Team W L OTL GP PTS PTS/G
Ducks 25 7 3 35 53 1.51
Capitals 23 8 3 34 49 1.44
Sharks 23 9 4 36 50 1.39
Lightning 23 10 1 34 47 1.38
Penguins 22 9 4 35 48 1.37
Blues 19 9 5 33 43 1.30
Kings 20 11 3 34 43 1.26
Flyers 19 10 5 34 43 1.26
Rangers 19 11 4 34 42 1.24
Predators 18 10 6 34 42 1.24
Blackhawks 20 12 3 35 43 1.23
Panthers 19 11 5 35 43 1.23
Islanders 17 11 4 32 38 1.19
Red Wings 18 13 4 35 40 1.14
Avalanche 20 15 1 36 41 1.14
Bruins 19 14 4 37 42 1.14
Stars 15 13 6 34 36 1.06
Wild 14 19 5 38 33 0.87
Yeah, but that makes perfect sense. His value dropped to a 2nd and a prospect, not a 4th.
Talbot at the draft was worth a 2nd and 3rd.
Reimer would have cost SJ a 2nd for sure in 2015 so that's 39th overall at the time.
Jones for what looks like 21st or 22nd overall in 2016.
We paid ~20 draft spots to get Jones.
Reimer getting a 4th because he's a UFA for one, two there wasn't a big market for goalies like there was in July 2015, isn't that bad. If SJ doesn't trade for Reimer he's more than likely still a Leaf.