Alaskanice
Registered User
Benning isn’t awful. He’s better than he’s being given credit for. He is not EK. No one is. He’s a hard worker who has to do more than he should.
The trend in the NHL for six seven years now has been the need for d-men who can move the puck fast (either with a pass or with mobility).
Would be better if Thrun and Simek were here over Ferraro, Burroughs, Benning who cannot move the puck fast.
We know Simek is injury-prone but he has always been skilled.
DoubtfulQuinn is probably a superb street hockey and beer league coach.
Granlund hasn't been an impact player since his Minnesota days, and Couture alone isn't enough to impact winning on a season long scaleThe Sharks will deff get better with Couture and Grandlund, especially the PK but there is a chance. Once this team gets dismantled at the deadline the remaining team might be wild.
They will still be terrible, just not as terrible. Think loosing 5-2 instead of 5-0.Granlund hasn't been an impact player since his Minnesota days, and Couture alone isn't enough to impact winning on a season long scale
One top 6 center and one bottom six winger being played at center doesn't fix a team with 0 game breaking forwards, 8 bottom pair defensemen and 2 goalies who can't can't play like 1999 Hasek every night
We're finishing dead last this year, it's a lock
We were last in wins last year, the NHL just has the stupid point system and lottery that held us away from our deserved top pick
I just wonder HOW far in last we'll be, because there's no longer a question of whether or not it is going to happen
Those losses seem generate 0 points in the standings, so I think we still have a shot at breaking the cap era recordThey will still be terrible, just not as terrible. Think loosing 5-2 instead of 5-0.
I mean, I think the Sharks only entered a full rebuild last year, so it's going to take some time. They need to draft top-3 in 2024 and 2025, develop those prospects + Will Smith, and then see what they've got in terms of a core.I am certain we won't be competitive for many, many years. If we aren't fighting for the playoffs with a young, exciting team in 2028, I'll probably have given up on another cycle, like my Canucks friend has since their collapse/rebuild is stalled. But between now and then? It could stay ugly.
This is a massive concern of mine. Can't remember a player that this club developed effectively.I mean, I think the Sharks only entered a full rebuild last year, so it's going to take some time. They need to draft top-3 in 2024 and 2025, develop those prospects + Will Smith, and then see what they've got in terms of a core.
I think you just proved his point. Outside of Pavs, Friesen, and Braun, that's a depressing list.Pavelski, Wingels, Donovan, Friesen, Braun, Tierney, Murray, Demelo, Stalock, Ferraro, Gregor, Nieto. There’s more but that’s all I have at the moment.
To be fair, I don't think they've had a blue-chip prospect like Will Smith (+ others to come) to develop before. Also, in hindsight, Doug Wilson did not really have a development team in place whatsoever. Grier seems to be more focused on that, so hopefully we see some good results. It takes time too...Buffalo has accumulated quite the prospect pool (Thompson, Dahlin, Power, Cozens, Peterka, Quinn, Kulich, Benson) and is still not a contender quite yet. It's a long, painful process that hopefully gives you an 8-10 year contention window at the end of it. Eklund, Smith, Musty, Bystedt, and Muk is a good start, but there's a lot more work to do.This is a massive concern of mine. Can't remember a player that this club developed effectively.
When we had high picks, the game was different. Rathje, Stuart, Michalek and others bypassed the “prospect “ label and pretty much walked into the NHL.I think you just proved his point. Outside of Pavs, Friesen, and Braun, that's a depressing list.
To be fair, I don't think they've had a blue-chip prospect like Will Smith (+ others to come) to develop before. Also, in hindsight, Doug Wilson did not really have a development team in place whatsoever. Grier seems to be more focused on that, so hopefully we see some good results. It takes time too...Buffalo has accumulated quite the prospect pool (Thompson, Dahlin, Power, Cozens, Peterka, Quinn, Kulich, Benson) and is still not a contender quite yet. It's a long, painful process that hopefully gives you an 8-10 year contention window at the end of it. Eklund, Smith, Musty, Bystedt, and Muk is a good start, but there's a lot more work to do.
Pavelski, friesen, Braun, Ferraro, nieto. Weren't really developed by the sharks, they came into the nhl basically directly from the junior, college team.Pavelski, Wingels, Donovan, Friesen, Braun, Tierney, Murray, Demelo, Stalock, Ferraro, Gregor, Nieto. There’s more but that’s all I have at the moment.
They were still prospects. And these guys all played for a long time. I don’t see what is bad about that.Pavelski, friesen, Braun, Ferraro, nieto. Weren't really developed by the sharks, they came into the nhl basically directly from the junior, college team.
The team did not actually develop them, they had the talent needed to jump straight to the NHL, thats good scouting not good development of a player.They were still prospects. And these guys all played for a long time. I don’t see what is bad about that.
Tomato tomatoes.The team did not actually develop them, they had the talent needed to jump straight to the NHL, thats good scouting not good development of a player.
Every player drafted is a prospect until a time that they are firmly in the NHL.Tomato tomatoes.
So, going off of the things she says, is Zach Benson not a prospect??
What does it really matter?
Having a boatload of prospects is for what?? To get players in the NHL. If you have players that do it fast, is that worse than having developed them?
Yes! I agree, definitely. That's why I think it'll be 2028 before we're turning it around, just looking at other full rebuilds in the league. If the team had gotten out from under DW a year or two earlier, we'd be a year or two farther into it. His illness really hurt the process.I mean, I think the Sharks only entered a full rebuild last year, so it's going to take some time. They need to draft top-3 in 2024 and 2025, develop those prospects + Will Smith, and then see what they've got in terms of a core.
We don't have to worry about development if the prospect is ready to jump into the NHL. I would be extremely surprised if Smith does anything other than play 1-2 years in NCAA before making the team, and I don't think anyone is worried about BC. Our presumptive #1-3 overall pick in 2024 will likely have the same profile.Every player drafted is a prospect until a time that they are firmly in the NHL.
But you listed a bunch of players that you said were developed by the Sharks. But they weren't developed by the team, they were developed by there clubs before being drafted.
The Sharks have been pretty bad at turning players that need time in the AHL into regular NHL players. If they do not jump directly into the NHL it is pretty much guaranteed they are not going to amount to much.
Exactly, so the Sharks don't really have a good track record of actually developing prospects, which will need to happen with Smith, Musty, etc.When we had high picks, the game was different. Rathje, Stuart, Michalek and others bypassed the “prospect “ label and pretty much walked into the NHL.
Their best prospects played immediately:
Yes, any look at the historical record of the Sharks must recognize that we have a new management team in place and that old outcomes may not have any meaning anymore.We actually have a development staff now so it'll probably go differently for these guys and Todd Marchant oversaw a lot of defensemen making the NHL for the Ducks.
I'm gonna give them some time before passing judgment on this regime
He would be the second best defensemen on the team right now.Might as well resign David Schlemko while we’re at it.
I randomly wondered about this today too after seeing many other teams have these random kids play so well out of camp they make the team and actually start producing in the NHL. Been a while since that's happened here. Scouting department clearly needs some help.This is a massive concern of mine. Can't remember a player that this club developed effectively.
Add: expire several contracts with dead cap dollarsI mean, I think the Sharks only entered a full rebuild last year, so it's going to take some time. They need to draft top-3 in 2024 and 2025, develop those prospects + Will Smith, and then see what they've got in terms of a core.
Yea, we need therapy. The worst part is that we know it!Forum : if a player spends more than a year in the ahl they won't be an impact player at the NHL level
Also forum : the sharks have never developed an impact player because none of the impact players spent enough time in the ahl
Never change guys!