GDT: Game 5 | Leafs @ Bruins | COME BACK BEGINS - WAKE UP EDITION | Tuesday, Apr. 30 7 p.m. EST | Leafs trail series 1-3

Status
Not open for further replies.

egd27

Donec nunc annum
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2011
16,919
12,704
GTA
You don't just let a 99 point capable All-Star walk from your organization after giving him a sweet heart contract. That's just bad asset management. If anything you agree to let him work out a sign and trade and get back a major asset like the Tkachuck trade.

I prefer we kept him. There's room for growth.
Obviously that would be a preferable option. My point was if he becomes obstinate with his contract demands (including waiving NMC) they can't capitulate.
 

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
74,266
40,176
  • Like
Reactions: wingman75

Tak7

Registered User
Nov 1, 2009
13,076
4,866
GTA or the UK
Yeah I don’t think losing the main cog of a 50% PK and 10% PP is the problem you think it is.
I'm talking objectively, without analyzing his admittedly poor performance - you still have to replace the significant, multi-faceted roles he takes on in the lineup.

And you want to replace those holes via pieces you get back in a trade, not hoping you can get by with overpaying free agents.
 

fahad203

Registered User
Oct 3, 2009
37,349
20,692
As a guy that works in insurance, did you put it through your insurance? would be responsible for whatever your deductible is but it would be classified as not at fault and wouldn't effect your rates moving forward
Bro. Appreciate your feedback
As soon as you said that. I quickly checked with my insurance

They said I am I may be covered...


I owe you beers

If he's 75% dress him if only to play on the PP.

No. Why risk losing for long term
Let's see if we can win without him. If we do. He gets few days of rest.

If we don't. Well we dont
 
  • Like
Reactions: tom leafers

Martin Skoula

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
11,908
16,771
I'm talking objectively, without analyzing his admittedly poor performance - you still have to replace the significant, multi-faceted roles he takes on in the lineup.

And you want to replace those holes via pieces you get back in a trade, not hoping you can get by with overpaying free agents.

I don’t see why we need to get a UFA or trade to replace him as the puck carrier on the PP when Nylander can do the job just as well. PK specialists aren’t expensive. Domi did an ok job replacing him at ES on the Matthews line.

It’s clear we need a new look for how the team plays, replacing Keefe will go a long way but if Marner is still the main piece in those situations we’re going to continue playing some variant of Marner hockey. I’m not blaming him for it, he doesn’t decide how Keefe uses him, but either the next coach doesn’t use him the same way or we play largely the same brand of hockey.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40 and weems

Jojalu

Registered User
Feb 22, 2019
5,934
7,210
Are they though?


Im shocked I tell ya ...shocked
For all their regular season success, they have been upset quite a bit in thecpast 7 years.

They have blown series, lost series they were favourites.

Just because they havn't been as bad as the Leafs doesn't mean they have been good
 

Xecross

Registered User
Dec 1, 2018
6
4
I'm talking objectively, without analyzing his admittedly poor performance - you still have to replace the significant, multi-faceted roles he takes on in the lineup.

And you want to replace those holes via pieces you get back in a trade, not hoping you can get by with overpaying free agents.
I mean why do all those holes don't have to be replaced externally. It just means that more guys have the opportunity to step up and take on a bigger role. A couple guys stepping up and bringing in 1-2 pieces via a trade would fill those holes you mentioned. Might not be perfect, but given time, there's a good possibility that it would pay-off. (i.e. Knies taking on a PK role; albeit I don't know if that's the best idea)

It's been mentioned countless times before, but the Leafs need to do a better job at developing players and that means they need to give them opportunities.
 

supermann_98

Registered User
May 8, 2002
9,480
7,829
Visit site
I'm not afraid to make changes.

I'm afraid that you let Marner go for nothing, which sets you back as an organization for a very long time.
You let him go for the 11m cap space that you use to sign Shea Theodore and have money left over for a competent backup goalie, done and dusted and a better team almost immediately
 

Metroid

Слава Україні!!
Sep 6, 2006
5,260
5,574
Hellmouth
I've never used proline before, but I put $50 on the Leafs tonight (which is apparently the maximum I can bet on olg.ca, although I have no idea how long ago I must have set that limit), which pays out $75. Those seem like incredibly good odds.
I actually put 6.66 the other day for Leafs to come back and beat the bruins this series. lol nets me 49 bucks and change lol
Not expecting to win it, but it'll make things little more interesting
 
Last edited:

myleafs

Registered User
May 25, 2021
2,080
2,251
For all their regular season success, they have been upset quite a bit in thecpast 7 years.

They have blown series, lost series they were favourites.

Just because they havn't been as bad as the Leafs doesn't mean they have been good
I was responding to the poster who said the bruins are dealing with their own demons and from what I have seen so far, Im not seeing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jojalu

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
74,266
40,176
Bro. Appreciate your feedback
As soon as you said that. I quickly checked with my insurance

They said I am I may be covered...


I owe you beers



No. Why risk losing for long term
Let's see if we can win without him. If we do. He gets few days of rest.

If we don't. Well we dont
All that matters is winning tonight. Longterm is a problem for another day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wingman75

Tak7

Registered User
Nov 1, 2009
13,076
4,866
GTA or the UK
could it be any worse?
Yes. It's been a largely even series at even strength (Boston 7-6 Toronto in goals).

Take away that checking line, and Pastrnak cooks - which I suspect he will tonight now that Boston will be able to get away from that matchup
 

Leafsfan74

Registered User
Jul 2, 2018
5,052
5,299
Why? are the leafs just gonna bank the 11+mill and not add anything to the roster?
Precisely. Nothing is more valuable than $11M in Cap Space for a team that has won 1 Playoff Round in 8 attempts.

BTW, I also look to move Reilly too and see what Tavares is feeling with his NMC.

Look, at some point the team has to be blunt. It's not personal, it's strictly business. These players weren't making minimum wage and manning the checkouts of groceries stores during covid. They are making more in a season than many hard working people make their entire years.

I am not insensitive to their plight, but, they have been very well remunerated for the inconveniences of being traded.

Build around Nylander and Matthews, plus men like McCabb, Reaves and the young guns Knies, McMann, Benoit etc.

Use the money to get a legit #1 DMan if you can, and a legit #1 goalie. Some middle of the pack North South forwards and build balance. If you lose 5-6 points in the standings, so be it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

Drytoast

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
6,545
4,744
If you took him off the team, 11 days ago before game 1, does the series change in anyway for the better?

Feel free to take your time answering that one.
Leafs did just fine during his absence in the regular season. That's how we came to learn that Domi was a better fit for Matthews than Marner, because he's willing to drop em when appropriate.

Marner is a negative in the playoffs. Every minute on the ice is a chance this little scared f***er turns the puck over or loses a battle along the boards or doesn't take his man.

Now it gets even more obvious if you allow me to swap Marner out for 2 5M valued guys for the playoffs that WILL go into corners. For 5M I could get Kerfoot back as a 3C. For 5M I could have retained Hyman. For 5M I get another Bertuzzi. Or Luke Schenn...what are we talking about here?

Know what I'm not doing with Marner out of the line up?

I'm not over playing a defensive liability heavy minutes because he's paid 11M a season and is unfortunately one the leaders of this team.

That's what I'm not doing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

Tak7

Registered User
Nov 1, 2009
13,076
4,866
GTA or the UK
You let him go for the 11m cap space that you use to sign Shea Theodore and have money left over for a competent backup goalie, done and dusted and a better team almost immediately
They aren't a Shea Theodore and a backup away from being a contender, but fair enough.
 

ULF_55

Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
84,367
16,456
Mountain Standard Ti
Visit site
You don't just let a 99 point capable All-Star walk from your organization after giving him a sweet heart contract. That's just bad asset management. If anything you agree to let him work out a sign and trade and get back a major asset like the Tkachuck trade.

I prefer we kept him. There's room for growth.

The Leafs issues aren't because of marner, they're because there is no leadership, no Gilmour nor Trottier nor Sittler nor Sundin nor Roberts nor ...

A bunch of higher skilled and talented individuals. I'm kind of surprised Nylander was the one who spoke up on the bench. I think they have to demote the aura of Matthews being their key player, and make him a key player.
 

Rude Dog

Registered User
Dec 22, 2008
4,170
3,159
Haven't been able to watch a minute of hockey since the game Sat night. The thought makes me ill. But I will tune in tonight because I love to suffer. Haven't read any reports, but this illness thing is as strange as the migranes. I wonder if Mathews has mono?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3blizzard4
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad