Well, that's it for me.
You guys "enjoy" the game
https://twitter.com/canucks/status/787714326383644672
Forecast calls for a Hurricane to hit Vancouver at 7pm tonight. Rumour is it will be Lacking, so nobody should end up in the emergency Ward. I know it makes me a bit of an Aho with who I'm cheering for tonight, but it's really not my faulk.
You must be popular at parties
The storm blew some free tickets my way for this one, so i'll be at my first game since game 1 vs calgary.
Am i missing something here? It looks like alot of people are upset that there aren't lineup changes tonight...who is it that everyone wants in the lineup so badly?
Who would you take out of the lineup for either Skille or Tryamkin?
The storm blew some free tickets my way for this one, so i'll be at my first game since game 1 vs calgary.
Am i missing something here? It looks like alot of people are upset that there aren't lineup changes tonight...who is it that everyone wants in the lineup so badly?
We want Horvat to play with actual competent players. Also might as well try Tryamkin on the bottom pair instead of Pizza at some point.
Markstrom.
We want Horvat to play with actual competent players. Also might as well try Tryamkin on the bottom pair instead of Pizza at some point.
Bo on the 4th again? Anyway the only real issues is signing a guy for $6 mill then telling him yes you can play with Sedins, but not on the PP. How do you not put Ericksoon out there on a 4-3 PP in OT. Sutter is a glorified 3rd liner not PP1 material.
They should try Virtanen if they want a right handed shot.In case you're actually wondering it's the set-up the Sedins use
Usually Hank is stationed at the right near the goal lines while Dank is the obvious one time option in the slot.
Hank will saucer a one timer to the right handed point man (left handed D have the puck come across their body). The last person on the PP has to be a right handed player near the left faceoff circle because they're usually open for a one time option from the Dman that Hank just passed to.
It's why the Nucks used Sedin-Sedin-Salo (point man) - Kesler (left half boards) in San Jose 2011. If it's a 5 on 3 then the extra man would've been stationed in front of the net so yes it would've been Eriksson