I have this weird feeling Bergevin will be here past Gallagher's contract.
Admittedly, I thought Gallagher had high enough hockey IQ to be able to cover the decline in physical ability, kind of like late career Gionta who was still a high volume shooter and still excellent defensively. I even admit so at the beginning of this signing.The fact that it is buyout proof is just so funny to me. Why did Bergevin and Sedgwick implement that?
2,166,666 for the next 6 years to buy out....
Might be worth it
Saw this, and it feels like someone just poured peroxide in a cut on my leg....................geezus guys.Why did we need this bumped all the way to the top? Almost had a heart attack
He won't retire but he won't hold up and will end up hurt again sooner rather than later. I am not hoping he gets hurt, it's simply inevitable based on recent history.The issue with Gallagher is he'll play even if one arm is about to fall off. There is no chance he ever goes the Weber-Price route because he's too damn stubborn.
The only options are:
1. He retires
2. You buy him out
3. You pay multiple assets to get rid of him
Same here… bumping to fool even more peepsMy heart...for half a second I thought we extended him +6 so 10 more years of Gallagher
Who would bump this lol argh
No comparison, Skinner hasn't lost a step with his elite skating.With how Jeff Skinner rebounded, I still have hope Gally can rebound and be a 40-point player. Won't be worth his contract, but still better than what he was the last 2 years.
The issue with Gallagher is he'll play even if one arm is about to fall off. There is no chance he ever goes the Weber-Price route because he's too damn stubborn.
The only options are:
1. He retires
2. You buy him out
3. You pay multiple assets to get rid of him
I don't think you know what a buyout proof contract looks like. If we bought out Gallagher this summer we would have saved 5.7m this year, 6.7m next year, 4.2m the year after and 1.7m on the last year. Those are significant savings in 3 of the 4 years and so it's not remotely buyout proof.The fact that it is buyout proof is just so funny to me. Why did Bergevin and Sedgwick implement that?
Agreed. Gallagher's skating was never elite but it was solid. Now it's well below NHL average and he's just got no time to think with the puck. I think that's his biggest issue... time/space.No comparison, Skinner hasn't lost a step with his elite skating.
Maybe at some point, but absolutely not right now. The team will be terrible with or without Gallagher. May as well keep him around and run out the contract until the team needs the cap space / roster space to compete.2,166,666 for the next 6 years to buy out....
Might be worth it
He was good before playing with Danault. His biggest issue is that his body is beat up due to the hard style of play he's been playing for his entire career; dude's taken a beating.I think his biggest issue is he doesn’t have Danault carrying him anymore tbh. I don’t think he’s changed all that much.
Partly, but he plays a style that doesn’t suit other centers on the team. Him and Danault fit like a glove.He was good before playing with Danault. His biggest issue is that his body is beat up due to the hard style of play he's been playing for his entire career; dude's taken a beating.
You’re right about Gallagher’s contract it’s not buyout-proof but simply very ugly upon which to use a buyout.I don't think you know what a buyout proof contract looks like. If we bought out Gallagher this summer we would have saved 5.7m this year, 6.7m next year, 4.2m the year after and 1.7m on the last year. Those are significant savings in 3 of the 4 years and so it's not remotely buyout proof.
Want to know what a buyout proof contract looks like, go check out the buyout calc on capfriendly for Price or Weber. So for an apples to apples comparison, if someone had tried to buyout Weber's final 4 years like with Gallaghers, they would save 2.5m in year 1 then 500k in years 2-4. That's what a buyout proof contract looks like, you barely save any money making it pointless to buyout. Buying out Price's final 4 years would have saved the team 400K in year 1, and 1.4m in years 2-4 Again pointless to buyout because there aren't even any decent savings to be gained with a buyout.
It's the complete opposite of Gallagher's contract.