De Montreal
help
Watching overtime between Washington and Jackets right now, I cant help but envision a scenario in which a controversial goal is being reviewed in an overtime period of a game 7. Just imagine if this were to happen... in a Stanley Cup Final!
Ever since it was put in place, the goal review system is taking more and more place. I dont think it is fair for the fan not to know what are the arguments from each side while the referee are debatting in silence. Also, I think each coach should have the chance to make a case before the referee make a decision. I propose when a coach ask for a review, they have to explain why in a 30 secondes monologue. Then, opponent coach can do the same.
A while ago, NHL put microphone on referee for the benefit of the fans and it did wonder. Wether it's for the entertainment value, or because it's a good informative tool, I think an oral debate should be held every time there is a goal review. It's innoative, it's fun and it's a good way to teach the nation kids about civilized debate.
Thoughts?
Ever since it was put in place, the goal review system is taking more and more place. I dont think it is fair for the fan not to know what are the arguments from each side while the referee are debatting in silence. Also, I think each coach should have the chance to make a case before the referee make a decision. I propose when a coach ask for a review, they have to explain why in a 30 secondes monologue. Then, opponent coach can do the same.
A while ago, NHL put microphone on referee for the benefit of the fans and it did wonder. Wether it's for the entertainment value, or because it's a good informative tool, I think an oral debate should be held every time there is a goal review. It's innoative, it's fun and it's a good way to teach the nation kids about civilized debate.
Thoughts?