My last comment on this here, since it may be off-topic for this thread.
I have no problem with you thinking the current players on the team are boring, but focusing on location of birth, is really weird.
Not to mention we have one of the most dynamic defenseman to ever play the game on the team, who happens to be European, therefore meeting your geographical requirement.
Also, 85% of the time Zibanejad looked disinterested, and he played a boring style anyway. Weird example.
See, it's not ME focusing on the location of birth, it's this management. It seems to me that we go out of our way to turn this team into a North-American, "gritty", full of "leadership in the clubhouse". I gave a few examples to illustrate my purpose.
As for Karlsson, IIRC the scout (who is interestingly gone now) had to work hard to convince Murray to draft him where he did. He definitely does not fit the profile of this team.
I didn't think Ziba played a boring style. Sure, he didn't dangle his way to a goal, but he had a mean one-timer, and as he was filling out he had the chance to turn into a Bobby Holik type badass. I don't necessarily want every player to be stick-handling. Again, having complementary skills on the team would be nice.
I get annoyed of the desire for grit/character over seemingly everything else too, but I couldn't care less where a player is from.
You've just compared Havlat, Hossa, Alfie and Chara to a couple of old bottom 6 players and Brassard. Of course you preferred the first group, that's a group of all-stars. Burrows, Kelly and Brassard aren't the equivalent players on this team. That would be Karlsson, Turris, Hoffman and Stone. You've criticized Cherry for wanting his team a certain way, but you're doing the same thing. You want a bunch of Europeans, they're exciting to you. A guy like Da Costa was worth the price of admission for you. You've presented the Turris trade in a negative light which is insane, that was a great hockey trade; who cares if it was a Swedish prospect going the other way?
See, I'm furthest from someone who wants diversity for diversity's sake. What I'm disputing is that we seem to be limiting our search for talent on purpose toward a certain profile of player: North American, "gritty", etc. Stuff that Don Cherry, Aragorn, and others of their generation like in a hockey player. In doing so we're missing out on plenty of talent.
I listed the Turris trade because I didn't want to cherry-pick. Not every trade for a North American was a bad one. It's just interesting to me that almost every trade, good or bad, ends up offloading a non-North American and brings in one. We end up with a team that I find, right or wrong, boring and one-dimensional, and at odds with all the current trends in hockey.
lol dude, what are you even trying to imply here with this "white bread" comment? The NHL is like 98% white. If you don't like watching privileged white guys playing sports, there are plenty of other options available.
As far as Russians go, I think the Sens are missing opportunities for sure but convincing them to come over seems to be a bit of a headache (unless they're a blue-chipper). Most of the mid-late round picks play in the KHL until they're 23-24 and then make the jump over. The Sens can't be wasting precious draft picks on guys that refuse to sign.
Europeans are white too, I guess my choice of "white bread" was bad. I thought my intent by that choice of adjective was clear.
I'm not even accusing the management to be racist or anything. It could simply be (and now we're back on topic), that this team doesn't have the resources to go scout players outside the Ottawa region (exaggerating a little, but you get my drift), and to get them on board with coming here before they're drafted (Tarasenko). Hence our collective relief when a guy like Hogberg or Jaros finally accepts to come over. Hence the management's efforts to draft local guys, or even to trade up to draft a guy with ties to the region. (still, doesn't explain letting a guy like Da Costa go for nothing
)
Back when Melnyk used to give the team more resources, it seems that we were more willing to look outside.