guymez
The Seldom Seen Kid
- Mar 3, 2004
- 33,541
- 13,433
Your entire argument of Yak struggling defensively is based on your anecdotal "I watched the games" evidence. Anyone who watched the games also saw Hall, Eberle, Hemsky, Jones and Smyth doing the exact same things. Are you applying a double standard or are those mistakes given less weight because of the player's "experience"?
So you are suggesting that anyone who watched the games could see that Hemsky, Hall, Eberle, Jones and Symth were the equivalent to Yakupov defensively?
Then in the next breath you are stating that because I saw things much differently that I must therefore have a double standard?
You are pretty good at attempting strawman arguments but if you honestly think that Yak is just as good (or bad) defensively as any other Oiler forward it really does make me question just how much you know about hockey.
The Player A/Player B part was obviously an oversimplified example to show a point. Your argument was more experience always equals better defensive ability. It wasn't players always improve after their rookie season. There's countless numbers of players who have plateaued or regressed defensively as they've gained NHL experience. I should hope you can understand that without needing a list of examples.
Not improving defensively (with experience) for a legit NHL player is the rare exception not the rule. Experience is absolutely essential to improving as a hockey player. So your claim that not all do is irrelevant because it is an extreme outlier.
Honestly its actually a joke that you are choosing to debate that point.