Impossibles said:
The cap allows all NFL fans to have a chance at winning it all (well, except Arizona).
One assumes you mean all NFL
teams, not fans, though certainly some fans inject themselves to that exaggerated extent into their team's fortune.
Indeed, all NFL teams have a chance to win, as you state. Because the gloriously restrictive economic system in the NFL has forced parity. Mediocrity. Many people love sameness, obviously. That's cool. Just don't deny that it exists.
CarlRacki said:
...it's undeniable that some teams do make more than others and without a cap those teams - as they do in uncapped leagues - will use that advantage to make themselves better on the field of play.
As has been proven out by the big payroll Blues, Rangers, Leafs and Flyers using their economic advantage to achieve greater success in recent years than the Sabres, Hurricanes, Ducks, Lightning and Flames. You know, all those "fluky, one-year wonders"? Hmmm, better to be a economic one-year wonder than a high-priced no-year wonder.
In a league where the competitive zenith is the Stanley Cup (and nothing else), there are
more than a few examples of teams with lesser resources having achieved more than others who have expended resources unwisely. Just have to open one's eyes and acknowledge the facts. (Likewise, teams
with resources, who have repeatedly made shrewd mangement decisions have won, regularly, i.e., Colorado, Detroit, NJD.)
Undeniable, indeed.