Man the last time Arsenal won the league none of their overseas fans could even watch the games live. Get outta here with that. You’ve actually never seen them win the league so I wouldn’t be too critical of fans who have
Interesting criteria. So just from current or recent PL clubs that also at least excludes fans of Arsenal, Aston Villa, Leeds, and Manchester United which all have partial or majority stakes in other clubs through their owners. Maybe your purity rules should be pinned somewhere?
It's almost like I'm not the one that brought up historical trophies... but you guys can't go 5 posts without using that as a defense when it has nothing to do with the title race this year
I think being ahead of schedule and adding three players in January makes a really big difference. Yes I think that changes the equation quite a bit. I would have loved to sign a Trossard equivalent instead of having to watch Darwin Nunez and Luis Diaz trip over each other every week. It matters.
It has everything to do with the things you people say. Let’s put it this way. The person trying to defend themselves and arguing ‘I’m not acting like a baby you are’ is the one that needs to grow much thicker skin. Arsenal fans said plenty, now everyone is laughing, and you can’t take it?
It kind of does though. Over the last two seasons we’ve been hearing how historically great this Arsenal team is, and they’ve won nothing. Historical trophies matter. When You go against Pep City, it’s not easy to win trophies. LFC were still able too. All we’ve had to hear about for two years is how a non-trophy winning team who were not putting up as good point totals were better. That argument is now over.
Yeah I guess I really am acting like a baby for laughing at Liverpool fans (and the other team's fans here too FWIW) because you're so insecure about your own team's misfortunes against City that none of you cared to post here at all during the games but then as soon as City won you all flooded in with "See that, Arsenal aren't on our level. Can't even beat City to a title."
Your lack of specificity in the criteria I asked you for is not my fault, it's yours. Changing or adding criteria because you don't like the result of what you posted is on you, not me.
Is this the Michael Jordan documentary? Because you're literally fabricating stuff in your head about us saying "we're so much better than that 97 point Liverpool team" just so you can mention your one PL title lol.
Whenever an Arsenal poster responds to some stupid take it is the Arsenal poster that is unbearable and don't have thick skin.
Careful, apparently we're not allowed to be critical of fans that have seen their team win the title even when they're coming up with the most ridiculous takes
Define what the "fabric of football" even is. Just sounds like some made up thing you get to use to take moral superiority in any conversation you want to derail what the original topic was.
Our friend from St Louis (and others) was certainly on that train especially last year
The Pejorative Slured part is that when Arsenal last won the EPL was on Sportsnet in Canada and a year before Liverpool won the CL in Turkey. He's speaking as if Arsenal last won during the black and white TV era with no internet.
I'm not posting much during games anymore because it makes it more difficult to actually watch the games. If City hadn't won I would have flooded in and said 'thank f*** they lost.' For some reason you think the consolation prize is better than the first prize. Making fun of Arsenal is only the consolation here.
No, this absolutely did happen. I don't care enough to find it but it happened. If you didn't do it then fine but other people did.
Strasbourg hasn't been owned by locals since the early 90s. Outside of Germany, most football clubs are no longer owned or controlled by fans or locals. Being owned by a club from another league that just wants to use you for their benefit is definitely worse than being owned by some foreign billionaire who just wants you for prestige, for sure.
I believe every club should be punished for violating rules. Full stop. There is no hypocrisy here because I haven't once argued that Chelsea shouldn't face punishment for rule violations. You decided I can't take this stance because Chelsea has also violated rules in the past (and faced punishments for it) and is currently engaged in conduct that is within the rules tough problematic.
