saintunspecified
Registered User
- Nov 30, 2017
- 6,052
- 4,347
You made it sound like you didn't want anything to do with him.
Everything depends upon the price. He wouldn't get traded anyway.
You made it sound like you didn't want anything to do with him.
Ha. That's a theory. We're now in a position where we need to sign Brock Nelson so our center position doesn't go to total **** next season, yet a top 5 franchise center should be let go for what exact reason now?
If your theory is true I hope Lou writes the fans an open letter telling them to take it easy on Tavares as he really wanted to come back, but he's the reason JT went to Toronto.
What I don't know is why Florida would want to move Hoffman?
Are they having or expecting cap issues?
And also because the Panthers need some defensive help. And with only one year left on his contract, I can understand very well the Panthers wanting to use Hoffman as a bait to get a defenseman (especially if they don't intend to offer him a contract extension). He is currently having the best season of his career, so maybe it's a good timing to trade him.I believe the only reason Hoffman is on the block currently is because Florida wants to sign Bob and Panarin. Also, Hayes is definitely better than Nelson.
Just a gut feeling on my part but I think there is a greater probability of not signing any of Lee, Nelson and Eberle than signing all 3. I think this is why Lou did nothing at the deadline. He didn't want to disrupt what the team has done this season but he also didn't want to disrupt his off season plan.
Eberle is probably gone, however is there a chance he might want to sign a 1 year deal to try to raise his value? Probably not here though.
Just a gut feeling on my part but I think there is a greater probability of not signing any of Lee, Nelson and Eberle than signing all 3. I think this is why Lou did nothing at the deadline. He didn't want to disrupt what the team has done this season but he also didn't want to disrupt his off season plan.
All forwards under this current system will see reduced offesnsive numbers.
All forwards under this current system will see reduced offesnsive numbers.
Except for Nelson, Cizekas, Clutterbuck
Increased TOI for all three, with Zeeker at 20.7% Shooting vs. career avg of 11.7% and above norms for Clutter and Nelson. Zeeker and Nelson lead the team in EN goals. Again the system is designed to absolutely minimize mistakes and high risk offensive scenarios, ideally leaving the Isles competitive in every game.
So you write a blanket statement like
<<<
All forwards under this current system will see reduced offesnsive numbers.
<<<
Then you directly negate your own statement in the next post.
Tisk, tisk - that's against the rules on legitimate posting.
I don't think you'll find a soul here who believes we're re-signing all three. Heck, I don't think you'll find one who wants us to.
But if you're trying to say you're feeling like all three will be allowed to walk...
A few things about that notion:
- Can a team allow its captain to walk two summers in a row?
- With the biggest role he's ever had, Nelson is having his best ever season. But if he were a quicker shooter, a more adept passer, and a more opportunistic individual, he could easily have 60+ points already. How much will TROTZ want to have him stick around?
- Statistically, Eberle is having one of the worst seasons I've ever seen an upcoming UFA who should be in line for his biggest payday ever have. He must be upgraded upon. Right?
- Lou must make decisions on Lehner and Filppula too. Each has earned a continued NHL job like the one he's filling out right now, respectively. It may take a raise for each to retain them.
- On top of these internal issues, Lou has to figure out how to IMPROVE this team via UFAs (there are a good handful of game-changers out there) and/or trades (a good handful of young proven scorers who may no longer fit their team's budget).
Article in the Athletic says with the emergence of the young defense, Leddy may be expendable to bring in some top 6 help. Possibly in a deal for RNH or a young Winnipeg forward. His contract is desirable for a high end 2nd pairing guy who is still a top skater.
I'm mixed on it. Free agency would be ideal, maybe with Lou and Trotz and the Isles success this year, the island can be more appealing now.
This is my ideal scenario. I honestly feel with the combination of young defenseman developing and Trotz system that Leddy is expendable. He hasn’t produced offensively like he was billed to do and he’s not great defensively.
I don’t think EDM does that trade but you never know. Even if we had to add. I’d do it.
As far as WPG the only guy I can think of is Little but he doesn’t do it for me.
Article in the Athletic says with the emergence of the young defense, Leddy may be expendable to bring in some top 6 help. Possibly in a deal for RNH or a young Winnipeg forward. His contract is desirable for a high end 2nd pairing guy who is still a top skater.
I'm mixed on it. Free agency would be ideal, maybe with Lou and Trotz and the Isles success this year, the island can be more appealing now.