studebaker17
Registered User
- Jan 24, 2010
- 1,263
- 205
If Drew Doughty were a UFA, he'd easily be making $8.5M+.
Apples and oranges.
I doubt 8.5 would even be in the ball park
If Drew Doughty were a UFA, he'd easily be making $8.5M+.
Apples and oranges.
All I know is before he was hurt in that Florida game, he was having his best season as a Leaf. He is not as bad as he finished the season, you just don't play 60 solid games and go in the tank like that.
Exactly. Someone who can stabilise the puck would be nice. You know, our own Josi and it's likely someone like Gardiner/ Rielly could be the one.We shouldn't be considering trading Phaneuf. We need to be looking for another top pairing guy so we can have an actual top PAIRing.
Leafs need a player so that Phaneuf can be the Bouwmeester for the Leafs.
Not good enough to carry a 1st. pairing, but good enough to be on the first pairing.
Not sure Rielly has the upside to play Pietrangelo's role?
Exactly. Someone who can stabilise the puck would be nice. You know, our own Josi and it's likely someone like Gardiner/ Rielly could be the one.
Leafs need a player so that Phaneuf can be the Bouwmeester for the Leafs.
Not good enough to carry a 1st. pairing, but good enough to be on the first pairing.
Not sure Rielly has the upside to play Pietrangelo's role?
Dion with Pietrangelo would be one of the best defensive pairings in the NHL.
I harkin back to the Kyper tweet, 2 months ago, both ontario captains on the trade block.
Wonder if there is still something up, Dion's modified NTC kicked in, I have to think the western team was on his list, maybe if injuries kick in, his value will go higher. Patience is the key here, Leafs may get a huge return.
Leafs did quite well, in a Leafs bumbling never win anything sort of style, before Phaneuf arrived and the Leafs will survive when he's gone.
Some people act as if the Leafs future is dependent on Phaneuf. Makes you wonder if they watched hockey before 2009?
Moving Phaneuf could land a couple decent prospects from a team looking for a great #2.
Leafs should be building for the future, they can't compete with the elite teams today, and a slower Phaneuf isn't going to be the difference maker in 3-4 years.
I doubt 8.5 would even be in the ball park
watch what subban gets. doughty >> subban.
That was a hit. What was his injury?
I get it, you want a good reason for Phaneuf sucking at the end of the season, but that doesn't mean you should just fabricate one.
Leafs did quite well, in a Leafs bumbling never win anything sort of style, before Phaneuf arrived and the Leafs will survive when he's gone.
Some people act as if the Leafs future is dependent on Phaneuf. Makes you wonder if they watched hockey before 2009?
Moving Phaneuf could land a couple decent prospects from a team looking for a great #2.
Leafs should be building for the future, they can't compete with the elite teams today, and a slower Phaneuf isn't going to be the difference maker in 3-4 years.
How is this fabricated? You asked I provided proof? Do you have any proof he wasn't hurt late in the season after that hit. He missed many practices as per Jonas Siegel tweets due to maintanance days. Which is more proof than claiming he wasn't ailing.
That was a hit. What was his injury?
I get it, you want a good reason for Phaneuf sucking at the end of the season, but that doesn't mean you should just fabricate one.
I didn't ask for proof. I asked why the unjury was. Separated shoulder? Sprained ankle?
You showed a video if a hit, and fabricated an unspecific nagging injury.
I didn't ask for proof. I asked why the unjury was. Separated shoulder? Sprained ankle?
You showed a video if a hit, and fabricated an unspecific nagging injury.
I didn't ask for proof. I asked why the unjury was. Separated shoulder? Sprained ankle?
You showed a video if a hit, and fabricated an unspecific nagging injury.
Allow us to call up the Leafs training staff for you and get to the bottom of that.
Phaneuf gets hit, labours back to the bench, misses part of the game, comes back, begins missing practices. Draw a freaking conclusion instead of being intentionally obtuse.