The hype about Lafreniere was very big, wasnt it?
Absolutely the most for a winger in a long time. He for sure had way more hype than at least the 3 1OA before him at least.
I think there is an issue, moreso in this era of hockey, where the rookies in general have a way harder time early on in their careers if they come immediately. I mean, the Jack Hughes saga is a great example. People were going absolutely crazy with the takes during his first couple years, and now he is one of the leagues superstars, and not impossible seeing him take home a couple awards in his career.
Becoming an NHL success is way more than just being the best junior or having the best draft year from an absolute perspective. If you don't seem like the best player in your class, but you have a lot of translateable skills and things that if you just make slight adjustments, will make you the guy. If you want someone from 2020, look at Stutzle.
With Lafreniere, it felt like you had a old kid for his class, who were way better and more developed than his peers, lacking in skating, effort and discpline. But he whipped the juniors and had the points. I would imagine the canadian part played in well too. But when it came to the NHL, those weaknesses actually got exploited, and his chances to exploit things like in juniors dissapeared. Generally, I think it is pretty dangerours to take high picks or swings on players that don't have many skills that are "game-breaking", meaning they have attributes that can be projected to crack open opposition at the NHL level.
In a lot of way, Laf is similar to Noah Dower Nilsson from this years draft(way better obv). NDN was by far the most point productive 05-born swede in j20, but got drafted 73rd, and as the 7th swedish forward born 2005. Reason is, his skills and ways are not very likely to project to the next levels in the same way. In some ways, the weaknesses are similar to Laf.
With all this said, I do think the Rangers also are massively responsible for all of this. Laf, Kakko, Kravtsov and Andersson? Like, at some point questions needs to be asked of the organisation. I might have though some of these players were slightly overrated at the time, but there is no way it all should have crumbled like this. The way the team flippantly has treated their deveolopment is just another sign.