But he's a liability in the D-zone bruh!Come to us, Kirk. The Romulans can't find you here in Jersey.
But he's a liability in the D-zone bruh!
I'm all against overpaying for UFAs. I'm a penny pincher at heart. I don't like spending even when I have it.
That being said, I'm willing to overpay for Shattenkirk for a few reasons:
1. We have nothing in our D pipeline. NOTHING. Even if we got the first pick next year, we're 2 or 3 years away from having a chance of a top pairing D man from within.
2. Shattenkirk just fits our needs so well, and we fit what he's looking for. It's almost like a custom made situation (except that he grew up a Rangers fan).
3. Even if we wait for the rebuild to continue, I can't see any potential 1st pairing D men coming to market. I mean, I think there's been some rumors with Karlson, etc, but I'm not sure how much I believe them, and it's just so rare for someone like this to come to the open market.
I figure Shattenkirk to be a 7year 5.5-6M player. If he was home grown, liked it here, and was up for an extension that's what I'd expect to pay for him. As a UFA, I was willing to go up to 6.5M, but given the 3 points I just made, I'd probably not go ape if he got 7x7, and probably front loaded. I'm just not sure I could justify anything more.
One player i'd like us to take a look at in FA is Jordan Weal. He could be an astute pickup given how thin we are at RW (especially if Bennett doesn't return), he performed very well with the Flyers last year and is only 25 years old. His style of play also meshes well with what our management is trying to build towards, i'd definitely have no objections to us offering him a contract.
I know he's met with the Canucks, Leafs & Canadiens, but there's supposedly a bunch of other teams interested in him, I hope we're one of them.
One player i'd like us to take a look at in FA is Jordan Weal. He could be an astute pickup given how thin we are at RW (especially if Bennett doesn't return), he performed very well with the Flyers last year and is only 25 years old. His style of play also meshes well with what our management is trying to build towards, i'd definitely have no objections to us offering him a contract.
I know he's met with the Canucks, Leafs & Canadiens, but there's supposedly a bunch of other teams interested in him, I hope we're one of them.
I'm all for adding skill and offense, but at some point we do need to address the toughness of this team. Weal is 5-10 and not even a buck 80 and brings no physicality. By no means do I want to add useless pluggers to fill the bottom 6 that only add physicality, but it wouldn't hurt to add some grit.
I have been a little bit worried about Shattenkirk's signing, because of his playoff performances and possible deterioration over the years. But all of these Nubmer6's points are very good reasons why we should sign him if it is possible. Yeah, maybe we pay too much for him, but how else we can find as potential offensive TOP4-Dman as Shattenkirk is? I also expect that if Shattenkirk signs with the Devils Shero tries to add another Dman via trade this or next summer.
If we don't make a serious push for KS (or Schultz as plan b I guess) then that will tell me everything I need to know about where we are heading as a franchise. It is not often that players with a certain skill set that fits a glaring need (and no in house option exists) are available when you have the cap space for such a transaction. Talking about potential issues five years down the road is beyond over-analyzing a situation, especially when at the moment he would be the only known potential problem.
This is a no-brainer.
If we don't make a serious push for KS (or Schultz as plan b I guess) then that will tell me everything I need to know about where we are heading as a franchise. It is not often that players with a certain skill set that fits a glaring need (and no in house option exists) are available when you have the cap space for such a transaction. Talking about potential issues five years down the road is beyond over-analyzing a situation, especially when at the moment he would be the only known potential problem.
This is a no-brainer.
Schultz is a restricted FA. Pittsburgh qualified him.
Not to mention he's much worse defensively then Shattenkirk and he's only got this one really good season to his name.
So then hes barely even an AHL dman?!?
I *REALLY* don't like Schultz, probably because of his disasterous time in Edmonton. Yes, he did much better in Pittsburgh, but so did Lovejoy. I don't know if Pitt brings out the best in defensemen, or it just suits the style of some of them, but I'm gun-shy now.
I'd take Schultz if he were available, but I wouldn't expect him to score 51 points again this year. I'd also rather Moore not be here if we had Schultz.
Send Mcleod and Hischier back to junior, Wood, Quenneville, Zacha and Santini to Binghamton​
sign Shattenkirk, Thornton, Marleau and Radulov
Hall Thornton Radulov
Marleau Zajac Palmieri
Blandisi Henrique Noesen
Pietila Coleman Lappin
Greene Shattenkirk
Moore Lovejoy
Mueller Severson
Am I doing it right?