Advanced stats
Registered User
- May 26, 2010
- 11,657
- 7,565
I have the same. I'm calling BS on the 133.This is an error. If you press the Canada button on the list to the left it shows 67, not 133.
I have the same. I'm calling BS on the 133.This is an error. If you press the Canada button on the list to the left it shows 67, not 133.
I have the same. I'm calling BS on the 133.
I have the same. I'm calling BS on the 133.
The John Hopkins source you linked to made an error. If you click “Canada” on the list to the left it shows 67, not 132.Cases in Canada just jumped from 66 to 132 overnight
The John Hopkins source you linked to made an error. If you click “Canada” on the list to the left it shows 67, not 132.
The “don’t panic” advise applies to stocks as well. I have a couple of mutual funds that are taking big hits right now. They took big hits back in 2008 too. I left them alone back then and they had bounced back and were in the black within two years. Unless you really, really need your money or have invested in highly speculative stocks, just try to ignore your investments. This isn’t the time to sell and not the time to gamble with a big buy. I would just leave whatever cash I have in savings or GICs.
I checked my stocks for the first time in two weeks today (I've been purposely not looking because there's no point but I had to pay the bills so it was unavoidable) and I was pleasantly surprised to be only down $100k. No idea how bad after today though (and of course if this continues).
On another note, I had a meeting with a major auto parts manufacturer client of mine the other day (major under the radar company, he's a billionaire nobody's ever heard of). He has facilities all over Ontario and the 'States and he seemed completely unconcerned and is operating as usual.
My clients are up. Nearly all of them.
"These people"? Jesus, it's just a discussion and I'm not "peddling" anything.
The mortality rate is much lower than the reported 3.4%. It's actually zero so far here in Canada. The rates are inflated because the countries worst hit so far didn't even know they had it at first so there's no way to measure people that were asymptotic and people that just assumed they had the flu or a cold. The stated rate is based on *confirmed* cases.
FFS I'm tired of getting insulted over this. Go f*** yourself actually.
Severely ill people are much more likely to be tested (and die) than those with mild illness. Washington state is no longer testing people with suspected mild illness, and I believe the same is true for many health care groups in California. Don't know what is going in Italy or S.K., but I suspect they do the same.That’s the denominator in the equation. The population impacted.
The numerator is equally important.
Unless you have a test while alive or when you pass.. there’s no way to know what people may have died of.
Lack of testing impact both ends.
That's good news, but market trials (in the U.S. at least) usually take about 1 year to complete.The growing sentiment that COVID-19 is a man made pathogen is disturbing on so many levels. The question is whether it was released intentionally or by accident.
On a positive note, yesterday I read an article that Israeli scientists believe they are on the cusp of developing a vaccine within a few weeks.
Yes.
Imperfections in our system aside (or in the UK’s NHS) it is without question better to treat people than not.
It’s better to test more people than live with unknowns. It’s better to establish baselines to know if mitigation efforts, eventual vaccines or virus mutations have any impact.
Our systems allows for this.
The USA’s system does not.
Flu death rate in 2018/19 was 0.098 % in the United States
The Global Death rate for Coronavirus is currently around 3.4%
These people trying to pedal number of deaths, would be the same people who would say that World War 1 wasn't too bad, because it only killed three people by day 2.
Ah yes, and here is the typical reaction that connects it back to politics. Very unsurprising.Media makes a ton of money on this so they over report it. Its like their hatrrd of Trump. Number 1 goal is clicks. I have faith humanity isnt stupid and will realize this panic is unneccessary.
Ah yes, and here is the typical reaction that connects it back to politics. Very unsurprising.
It's been a bloodbath on Wall Street today, and the TSX has definitely seen better days as well.
I'm tempted to buy but I'm not convinced the market has bottomed out yet.
It's been a bloodbath on Wall Street today, and the TSX has definitely seen better days as well.
I'm tempted to buy but I'm not convinced the market has bottomed out yet.
What do you recommend buying? Honest question from a market rookie.Yep. Buy in spurts. The down days it's good to just continue. At some point it'll recover once people stop their overreaction and panicking. I think that's this week.
I guess I thought I saw something about hating POTUS as being the reason for media doing what they are doing.What? I was using an example of the media using something for clicks. Could be anything. Relax.
Sane people that ask questions?Sadly, although its a pandemic and has widespread consequences, people are going to feel inclined to be political about this. And, you can guess what kinds of folks with specific political persuasions are going to try to downplay the significance of what is happening.
I guess I thought I saw something about hating POTUS as being the reason for media doing what they are doing.
No matter what you do, always keep a diversified portfolio. Also, age factors into investment decisions. The older you are (closer to retirement), the more your portfolio should be weighted on fixed return assets. No one should be giving you advice without knowing a bunch of stuff about you e.g. age, risk tolerance, your other investments, etc.What do you recommend buying? Honest question from a market rookie.