That bickering finally got to Gretzky, who is said to have grumbled, "That's not why I came here."
Does anyone else notice the mixed message sent when Boston Bruins owner Jeremy Jacobs laments the rampant growth in player salaries while his company, Buffalo-based Sportservice, charges $4.50 for a bag of HSBC Arena popcorn with a base cost of what, a quarter? Not that Sportservice is alone. Arena prices are exorbitant nationwide no matter who's the concessionaire. Apparently it's OK for the owners to rip off the fans, but not for the players to rip off the owners.
Buffaloed said:Bob DiCesare of the Buffalo News also makes a lot of good points in this article:
NHL must put fans first upon return
The bottom line is the NHL hasn't done anything to nurture fan loyalty. Had they been treating the fans right all along as is done in the Augusta National example DiCesare provides, they would have that big national TV contract by now and enough revenues to keep everyone happy.
Even if Bettman were to get his 'linkage', that wouldn't be true. It's certainly not true now.mooseOAK said:There is a direct relationship between the costs to attend a hockey game and the amount that players are being paid.
It is always true. The money to pay the players as salaries were spiraling had to come from somewhere and as ticket prices kept increasing teams in a lot of the markets saw attendance suffer because of it.Weary said:Even if Bettman were to get his 'linkage', that wouldn't be true. It's certainly not true now.
mooseOAK said:There is a direct relationship between the costs to attend a hockey game and the amount that players are being paid.
mooseOAK said:If the fans don't want to pay for overpriced junk food, they don't have to buy it. However, judging by this guy's picture this seems to be a subject that is very close to his stomach.
There is a direct relationship between the costs to attend a hockey game and the amount that players are being paid.
hockeyscribe22 said:"There is a direct relationship between the costs to attend a hockey game and the amount that players are being paid."
If that's true then why did the Bruins recently promise that even when they get thier cap, ticket prices will only be "froze", as opposed to reduced as they and so many teams promised when this lockout started?
Be careful before making such a bold statement, because if you look at the facts, ticket prices started rising well before players' salaries. They have a lot more to do with arena costs, concessions and generally owning a team.
Bruwinz37 said:Agreed. Jacobs isnt the only one overcharging for popcorn, beer, etc. It happens everywhere and it is because of the astronimical contracts players receive. I do hope the NHL, if it gets cost certainty, will give a little back to the fans.....if the fans are still there that is.
The pro-PA people keep saying that 'everyone' thought the owner 'won' with the 1995 CBA. The only thing I can remember that could count as an owner 'win', was keeping the free agency age high.Russian Fan said:People forget the past so fast that it's just ugly. People are talking about 1994 like it was a clear WIN for the NHLPA. 10 years later we can say that but if INTERNET were what it is today, you would have seen that after the agreement, everyone in MEDIA circus & including the players thought the OWNERS were the CLEAR WINNER in this one. Everyone thought that the owners had everything in that CBA to get this hockey jump into the level of PRO SPORTS as a clear #3 in the U.S after the NFL & MLB.
wazee said:The pro-PA people keep saying that 'everyone' thought the owner 'won' with the 1995 CBA. The only thing I can remember that could count as an owner 'win', was keeping the free agency age high.
If 'everybody' thought the owners won, they must have based that on something. Why did the media think the owners won?
This is a serious question. I have asked it several times, but no one has given me an answer yet and I haven't been able to find anything on line...
Russian Fan said:Damn people are so naive, I can't believe it. Now owners are new ROBIN HOOD of hockey ? make me laugh as hell !
In Montreal I had my season ticket in 1999-2000 @ 65$ for one the best seats in town. Today the same seats are ..................114$ !!!!
Payroll didn't change that much back then from today !
Boston best ''owner'' made MILLIONS of Boston FANS & now they believe this guy is the saviour ? come on ! I can understand the hope that if the players are paid less, the tickets will be cheaper & the level playing field should be better but we're talking about a guy who consistently NEVER CARED about the BRUINS FANS, NEVER CARED about WINNING, he just put a team that looks like a bit competitive & put millions in his pockets.
Damn they even go to the arbitration room & slash Ray Bourque to pay him less even after what he did for this franchise. If at least the money they saved on Bourque was to get closer to be a CUP CONTENDER , I would have understand but that wasn't the case !
People forget the past so fast that it's just ugly. People are talking about 1994 like it was a clear WIN for the NHLPA. 10 years later we can say that but if INTERNET were what it is today, you would have seen that after the agreement, everyone in MEDIA circus & including the players thought the OWNERS were the CLEAR WINNER in this one. Everyone thought that the owners had everything in that CBA to get this hockey jump into the level of PRO SPORTS as a clear #3 in the U.S after the NFL & MLB.
mooseOAK said:If the fans don't want to pay for overpriced junk food, they don't have to buy it. However, judging by this guy's picture this seems to be a subject that is very close to his stomach.
There is a direct relationship between the costs to attend a hockey game and the amount that players are being paid.