You can add Kansas City to that, so it seems.
How much is it worth to be first into a market? We see it work in Vegas. But Utah was too small for the NBA when they went there and look at that area now.Cincinnati is a bit too close to Columbus to make a viable NHL market. It's only like an hour and a half drive. Same reason Orlando isn't really a viable NHL market. If it were about 50% larger in population, it would overcome that, but it isn't.
Omaha is still too small. There's been some thought that their growth will bring a pro sports team at some point, but it's still pretty far away. 10 years from now, maybe?
I always figured Columbus would box out Cincinnati, like if it didn’t happen then, then why would it? But if Cincinnati is interested, now I’m asking questions if I’m in Cleveland, too.
Depends on the market. Being first into Austin is a very different animal than being first into Dubuque.How much is it worth to be first into a market? We see it work in Vegas. But Utah was too small for the NBA when they went there and look at that area now.
How much is it worth to be first into a market? We see it work in Vegas. But Utah was too small for the NBA when they went there and look at that area now.
I always figured Columbus would box out Cincinnati, like if it didn’t happen then, then why would it? But if Cincinnati is interested, now I’m asking questions if I’m in Cleveland, too.
Didn't the naysayers think that Vegas would fail spectacularly?Cleveland doesn't have a strong enough economy to support a 4th major league team.
Didn't the naysayers think that Vegas would fail spectacularly?
Either someone(s) has a billion+ in pocket of willing to take that risk and/or they have studies showing it could/might work
No baseball teams draw enough on a daily basis.Not long ago Tulsa seemed to be in the mix. Has a nice, large modern arena, I believe. But it's been quiet since.
Oh, and the Cincinnati Reds don't draw so well....sure a small market and 81 home games to support, and at likely lower average prices than the NHL would necessitate, but a small market is a small market.
Yes they would and as we know from the Columbus expansion carving out a pre-existing market to a new one would take 20 years to build up a solid consumer base and would cannibalized both teams market.I always figured Columbus would box out Cincinnati, like if it didn’t happen then, then why would it? But if Cincinnati is interested, now I’m asking questions if I’m in Cleveland, too.
This is a good account as I can’t understand why the people running the Blue Jackets have been allowed to run amok the way they have with the decision making and seemingly no repercussions. In theory, is coming in to compete with them copacetic? It feels like that would weaken both.Yes they would and as we know from the Columbus expansion carving out a pre-existing market to a new one would take 20 years to build up a solid consumer base and would cannibalized both teams market.
My theory...
This was a thinly veiled threat to Columbus ownership. Its no secret here our majority owner is extremely hands off and really shows no interest in the franchise as he hasn't been seen for years in the arena even on official business. Basically the team is being ran by his accountant and only picks up the phone to approve signing authority but other than that he's a blank check approving everything. Normally you don't want owners influencing GMs but this situation is running too far the other way to where the inmates run the asylum when things go wrong which in Columbus has started to happen. To our owners as long as we are running a strong gate it doesn't matter win or lose. This is basically a callout to Columbus to take more pride in its franchise and to get its house in order.
I think about it like this: are college sports too watered down? Talent level, it always has been. But they’re basically printing money. There’s far different circumstances, but it’s in a state of rapid growth, and has shifted to being market-based. And they turnover their star players every few years.I can’t see how there’s enough talent in the league that’d fill 32-36 teams. A 16-team playoff is still the best format as well and I absolutely hate wild card/play-in rounds.
I’m not a billionaire businessman so WTF do I know, but how can a league that hypothetically watered down possibly be good for the NHL?
I can’t see how there’s enough talent in the league that’d fill 32-36 teams. A 16-team playoff is still the best format as well and I absolutely hate wild card/play-in rounds.
I’m not a billionaire businessman so WTF do I know, but how can a league that hypothetically watered down possibly be good for the NHL?
Nope its a "start taking pride in yourself or we are going to start putting the boot down on your throat".This is a good account as I can’t understand why the people running the Blue Jackets have been allowed to run amok the way they have with the decision making and seemingly no repercussions. In theory, is coming in to compete with them copacetic? It feels like that would weaken both.