Value of: Chris Tierney or Mikkel Boedker at the draft

Discussion in 'Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk' started by Kcoyote3, Jun 13, 2018.

  1. JoeThorntonsRooster

    JoeThorntonsRooster #PavelskiDestroyedJohansen

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Messages:
    15,576
    Likes Received:
    3,092
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    College Student
    Location:
    Fremont, CA
    I feel like you guys have an expendable defenseman who is a rough comparable. Perhaps Tierney+Dillon for Nutivaara+2nd?
     
  2. rt

    rt DingDongTippIsGone! Sponsor

    Joined:
    May 13, 2004
    Messages:
    61,040
    Likes Received:
    3,773
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    County Cork
    I wouldn’t trade pick 55 for Boedker. Someone suggested 74. Even that gives me pause. I don’t really want both of Boedker and Panik on the roster, either. Both are quite mediocre and without upside. They’re fine as filler, but a roster can contain only so much filler in the top nine.
     
  3. Pinkfloyd

    Pinkfloyd Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Messages:
    52,522
    Likes Received:
    956
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Occupation:
    Government Employee
    Location:
    Roseville
    I don't see really anything that could realistically be done sending Tierney to Columbus. The guys I'd want far outpace Tierney's value and I don't see a future asset I'd want to move him to Columbus for.
     
  4. stevo61

    stevo61 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    3,336
    Likes Received:
    554
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    Canada
    Myself and I feel the organization would be extremely hesitant to move any of the top 4 D. That would be Werenski-Jones Murray-Nutivaara
     
  5. Jame

    Jame Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    48,994
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Location:
    Florida
    What kind of contracts do you think Hertl and Tierny are going to get?

    I would think you need cap space for more than just Tavares... but in pursuit of D upgrades. Why trade Boedker for Gardiner (why would Toronto do that?). Aren't you better off getting picks for Boedker while pursuing free agency for D upgrades?
     
  6. Pinkfloyd

    Pinkfloyd Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Messages:
    52,522
    Likes Received:
    956
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Occupation:
    Government Employee
    Location:
    Roseville
    The Sharks have too many wingers so swapping them doesn't make sense. I don't see how Panik's a road block for bringing in Boedker when you look at the Coyotes top nine right now at the wing. Panik, Keller, Domi (if he stays), Perlini, and Fischer are all there right now and there isn't really anything unless someone has a big training camp like Crouse or Burke. I think even if that was a concern, Arizona shouldn't have a problem finding another suitor for Panik or whoever especially if the Domi stuff materializes.
     
  7. Kcoyote3

    Kcoyote3 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    7,458
    Likes Received:
    1,191
    Trophy Points:
    109
    The majority are close to the value of Tierney + Boedker, or far less

    Wow talk about weak arguments. Nylander isn't being drafted in a week, he was drafted two years ago. Also in general Tierney could catch a 20+ draft pick in this year's draft.

    No but a middle six young center and a middle six winger, both of which are capable of 40 points and probably cost 6-7 million are worth more than a journeyman defenseman and a 4th. So the way you determine trade values is severely flawed if anything.
     
  8. rt

    rt DingDongTippIsGone! Sponsor

    Joined:
    May 13, 2004
    Messages:
    61,040
    Likes Received:
    3,773
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    County Cork
    The Coyotes have to pick up a forward that is considerably better than Panik or Boedker. One way or another. If they accomplish this, and bey must, there won’t be room for Boedker and Panik. Both of whom I would prefer to be the weak link, rather than the typical type. :)
     
  9. Pinkfloyd

    Pinkfloyd Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Messages:
    52,522
    Likes Received:
    956
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Occupation:
    Government Employee
    Location:
    Roseville
    I suspect Hertl gets 5.5-6 mil and Tierney gets around 2.5 mil. Plenty of cap space for them as it stands especially when you look at their roster and see what moves are likely, they have room to do things. Toronto would trade Gardiner for Boedker and Heed to give Gardiner a fresh start, to have a winger that will contribute after they lose JVR and Komarov while still being easy to move him next year when they want to re-sign Matthews and Marner. As for free agency upgrades, there really isn't much there. Carlson is not going to be a cost-efficient move for their needs. Green may be the only real option in free agency. Everyone else is probably not a good fit for what they should be going after.
     
  10. Pinkfloyd

    Pinkfloyd Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Messages:
    52,522
    Likes Received:
    956
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Occupation:
    Government Employee
    Location:
    Roseville
    And I suspect that if that were to be the case, they could find a place for Panik if need be. In either case, neither Panik nor Boedker are the weak link of that bunch. lol
     
  11. Groo

    Groo Crazy 88

    Joined:
    May 11, 2013
    Messages:
    1,230
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    surfingarippleofevil
    Any interest in Boedker for Fischer
     
  12. Critical

    Critical AM...roll 1d4 goals

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    3,821
    Likes Received:
    1,636
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Fischer? Christian Fischer?
     
  13. Jame

    Jame Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    48,994
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Location:
    Florida
    They are not... but I don't expect you understand the value difference between trying to add the missing piece to winning a Stanley Cup (forsberg), or maintaining a cap structure to keep your stanley cup winner together (teravainen).... and adding relatively mid tier players in Boedker/Tierney.

    These valuations aren't even on the same planet.


    I guess we can trade Zemgus Girgensons for Josh Norris then... because, you know... what has Josh Norris doen :rolleys:

    [sigh]


    When did Jake McCabe become a journeymen?

    He was taken 11 picks before Tierney, and has been on the same development curve....

    McCabe=Tierny
     
  14. JoeThorntonsRooster

    JoeThorntonsRooster #PavelskiDestroyedJohansen

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Messages:
    15,576
    Likes Received:
    3,092
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    College Student
    Location:
    Fremont, CA
    There is no free agent D on Gardiner’s level outside of John Carlson who is probably getting $8M/8 year’s

    Hertl will get between $4.5 and $6M. Tierney will get between $2.5 and $3.5M.

    We have more than enough cap space to retain Tierney, Thornton, and Hertl without even moving Boedker or Melker Karlsson.
     
  15. Jame

    Jame Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    48,994
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Location:
    Florida
    I assume they you buyout Martin, to create the cap space....
    But I also assume San Jose will want to make 1-2 significant upgrades, given the window is closing and theyve got major UFA concerns coming..... (CouturePavelski next year).

    I don't Toronto makes that move... they have multiple Boedker's in the lineup already (Hyman, Brown)

    In their top 6, Boedker isn't supplanting Hyman, Brown, Marner or Marleau.... so you think they are trading a top 4 defensemen.... for a bottom 6 winger? In a bottom 6 where they already have Kapanen and Nylander?

    The player they would trade Gardiner for.... is Tierney, not Boedker. To replace Bozak/Plekanec/Moore... where they lack a bottom 6 center.
     
  16. Jame

    Jame Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    48,994
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Location:
    Florida
    I prefer D that play good D.... so I'd argue DeHaan or Pateryn would be great adds.
     
  17. Jame

    Jame Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    48,994
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Location:
    Florida
    It's tight... I guess upgrading the roster is not a priority...
    Are you buying out Martin?
    What does Thornton come back at?
     
  18. Pinkfloyd

    Pinkfloyd Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Messages:
    52,522
    Likes Received:
    956
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Occupation:
    Government Employee
    Location:
    Roseville
    You're missing the point with regards to the Toronto proposal. It was merely an example of a potential hockey trade to be made. The Sharks only need to dump cap if they're actually in on Tavares. They don't need to dump cap to keep their guys or go after a free agent that isn't Tavares since they're not going to have interest in Carlson really who would be the other premium top dollar free agent. But you're coming at it with antiquated thinking if you believe that you split the forwards off at the top six/bottom six. You need three good lines up front that could all at least be 2nd line caliber and let's be real. Boedker is a more proven commodity than Brown. They probably shouldn't be putting their eggs in the basket of a guy who is coming off a 14-14 season as a top six option. Boedker would be an upgrade on that spot and there's no reason to rely on Kapanen to take the next step at this point unless they have no choice.

    Sharks already have too many guys on their team that are defense oriented. They need someone who is an actual threat from the blue line besides Brent Burns and I would prefer it on the left side.

    Martin is probably bought out. Thornton has flexibility in his contract because he can take up performance bonuses to get paid if he was willing and the Sharks could lower his salary and cap hit to open space up for other things. I suspect that will be tied in with the potential Tavares signing and failing that any defensive adds. Sharks need to move a couple wingers as it is right now and one of them should be Melker Karlsson regardless but the 2nd one is up for debate based on how things play out.
     
  19. ThorNton Apologist

    ThorNton Apologist Jumbo needs a cup

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,882
    Likes Received:
    114
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    Cali
    No way Arizona goes for that. I think 74 is a realistic expectation in return
     
  20. Groo

    Groo Crazy 88

    Joined:
    May 11, 2013
    Messages:
    1,230
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    surfingarippleofevil
    Don't know until one asks.
    Can always work in somesort of plus. Seems to be the way things work around here
     
  21. Kcoyote3

    Kcoyote3 Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    7,458
    Likes Received:
    1,191
    Trophy Points:
    109
    I don't understand this argument. Somehow Teravainen who got a 2nd and a 3rd is a better return than Boedker and Tierney. I understand you're saying Chicago needed to shed cap, but even that is a stretch. That return is well within the return or Tierney and Boedker. Paajarvi was traded for a bottom six after struggling, Neids was traded but you wrote that off because you wanted to. This is why I hate when people ask for examples of trades. Because once someone provides it, it isnt EXACT and that means you can nitpick it to death. These trades happen. Top 10 picks aren't gold because they were once drafted top 10. They have to develop an NHL game.
    Ah yes, another top Sabres pick who has done absolutely nothing. Bet you wouldn't have traded him after his second year for Tierney and Boedker either.


    Oh yeah, because third line centers never return late 1sts. Especially ones that are 23 and RFAs. Go look at every deadline. Or just keep sighing because you have no concept of trade value. Teams want to add young 40 point players who play the PK as well.

    McCabe became a #6 defenseman when he couldn't progress past the bottom pairing on one of the worst defenses in the NHL. Journeyman defenseman is the wrong term, you're correct. But a third line center is far more valuable than a bottom pairing defenseman. And again you're obsessed with draft position and not player development. McCabe may be just fine, but he is not worth Boedker and Tierney. Go present that to anywhere on this board and see the results.
     
  22. THall4

    THall4 Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2014
    Messages:
    5,323
    Likes Received:
    295
    Trophy Points:
    79
    Location:
    Edmonton, AB
    Both for Lucic.....

    No, is okay...i'll find my own way out.
     
  23. rt

    rt DingDongTippIsGone! Sponsor

    Joined:
    May 13, 2004
    Messages:
    61,040
    Likes Received:
    3,773
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    County Cork
    By the middle of next season, I think Fischer and Perlini will be better than Boedker and Panik.
     
    Kcoyote3 likes this.
  24. SnS

    SnS Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,966
    Likes Received:
    1,085
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    Awards:
    I don’t think Hextall wants to trade back.
     
  25. Jame

    Jame Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    48,994
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Location:
    Florida
    Sorry that you don’t understand the argument. It’s pretty simple. Teams were will to PAY to rid themselves of contracts. In a Chicago’s case it was for cap space, to continue to contend for a cup.

    In Florida’s case, it was financial (Bolland)...

    That’s what was traded for...

    It’s is not in any way relevant to the trade value of Chris tierney.

    Thanks for being honest about not understanding


    That’s simply not accurate
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"