It just stated future considerations. But again this trade makes no sense for chicago with only 8 weeks or less to play hockey with a guy who has a expiring contract even if chicago retains his rights the guy doesn't scream successIs there a draftpcik involved? I thought it was just Gicewicz, and was more likely just a contract exchange, no?
All it is a AHL trade, but maybe he plays some for the Hawks. We literally have like half a team of AHL level players at this point. But if you are going to tank, do it like you mean it.It just stated future considerations. But again this trade makes no sense for chicago with only 8 weeks or less to play hockey with a guy who has a expiring contract even if chicago retains his rights the guy doesn't scream success
I get that but he could have asked buffalo for a pick as well . He makes 1.6 plus millionAll it is a AHL trade, but maybe he plays some for the Hawks. We literally have like half a team of AHL level players at this point. But if you are going to tank, do it like you mean it.
It just stated future considerations. But again this trade makes no sense for chicago with only 8 weeks or less to play hockey with a guy who has a expiring contract even if chicago retains his rights the guy doesn't scream success
It just stated future considerations. But again this trade makes no sense for chicago with only 8 weeks or less to play hockey with a guy who has a expiring contract even if chicago retains his rights the guy doesn't scream success
Your probably rightChicago likely wants bodies to play out the string instead of savaging their AHL roster to backfill all the forwards they've sent out.
I think most of the time it's nothing.Do teams actually get anything at all back at any point in time when they get "future considerations"? Financial compensation or anything? Or does "traded for future considerations" truly mean "traded for nothing at all" most of the time?
Chicago once traded FC in a deal with St.Louis.Do teams actually get anything at all back at any point in time when they get "future considerations"? Financial compensation or anything? Or does "traded for future considerations" truly mean "traded for nothing at all" most of the time?
Sometimes, it's not about the teams, it's about the player. Bjork wanted a chance at some NHL time, Buffalo is in the wild card race, he wasn't going to see the roster here. So a call is made, Chicago agreed. Sounds like 2 GM's giving a player some NHL life where the conditions for both clubs was right for it.Not computing this.
The Hawks could bring up any league-minimum minor-leaguer to fill a roster spot and help them tank. What does Bjork offer them at twice the cost?
I'm sure Buffalo doesn't mind clearing a one-way contract foe and AHL player off the books, but what's in it for Chicago?
Not computing this.
The Hawks could bring up any league-minimum minor-leaguer to fill a roster spot and help them tank. What does Bjork offer them at twice the cost?
I'm sure Buffalo doesn't mind clearing a one-way contract foe and AHL player off the books, but what's in it for Chicago?