Catanddogguitarrr
Registered User
If I want to take a goalie, I would go with number one goalies only. Very few #2 goalies are able to fill the job. Not every team have a goalie like the one we have if I get your point.They're probably alright with their goalies but if they could get an upgrade, they would probably do it in a heartbeat. If you look at all goalies in the league (starters + backup and even farm teams), how many goalies would you take as your number 1 right now? Some goalies have had decent stats as backups over the years but never managed to fulfill the number 1 position. Cam Talbot was fine as a backup for the Rangers and did even better in his first two years in Edmonton.. but this season, he's awful. Raanta was another decent backup and was posting decent stats early on. Carolina believed Scott Darling could fill in, he can't... well maybe next year, he could be back in form. Who knows.
I should have added that: most teams that I was talking about have had problems finding a number 1 goalie for years.
I think 6 years ago there was few good goalies around the league (around 6) and today there is more (around 10 to 15), they are like fresh mushrooms who have grown suddently.
We don't see the lack of good goalie in Montreal because we have a tradition of good goalies. We always have good one and a backup coming after. So it's not natural thinking about an hockey team with a bad goalie.
From distance I saw Philly having problems at that position since a long long time.
Sadly they lost a very good one in a car accident in the '80s ... and after never had one like that.
It's obvious Edmonton need a decent goalie if they want to reach the next level.
But thinking another gm would give the moon to fill that g position, I don't know. You have a point but it doesn't mean it will concretise in what you think.