Well I think perhaps he was really meaning the NHL chl rules should be chopped. Having to play Virtanen in the NHL or send him back to juniors rather than send him to the ahl last year was a giant pain in the ass.
It can be a pain in the ass from time to time...but you have to look at it from the CHL side of things. They can't afford to be losing the best players every year to the AHL because teams are in a big rush to "develop" everyone. Not only is it bad for the CHL itself in a revenue and entertainment sense...it would also severely degrade the developmental value of the single biggest feeder league for the NHL, by skimming out the top of the talent pool every year, diluting the level of competition.
Plus, in the end, i don't even think Juolevi is really a strong case against it like Virtanen was.
Virtanen was a big kid who was physically prepared to play against men. He was physically ready to make that next step. Even then, i think there's still a reasonable argument that he would've been better off heading back to Juniors for another year - especially if it had been a top notch developmental organization like the London Knights instead of the Calgary Hitmen.
Whereas Juolevi...it's the physical maturity aspect that looks like the biggest obstacle right now. Even if he
could be sent to the AHL...it's still a Professional hockey meatgrinder against a lot of grown men. He'd still be badly outmatched physically in the AHL right now, and exposed to risk in that.
It really doesn't hurt a prospect to go back to one of the best developmental junior hockey programs in the world for a year after their draft. Especially for a physically underdeveloped defenceman. It's actually a pretty terrific situation for him...great coaching, opportunity for expanded role and responsibility, and plenty of opportunity to really focus on continuing to get himself physically prepared for a jump to Pro hockey...rather than just trying to survive the grind.