But wasn't Matthews supposed to be a choker in big games?
Nobody has critisized him. That goal was awesome but for me, that first goal was sloppy defense from a two-way center.Matthews is solely responsible for goals against when he's on the ice and his goal was pure luck. Thanks for your contributions Winnipeg/Finland.
He made a nice play there to get by Rielly to the net, couldn't finish it though.
Now thats ridicoulous! Taking nothing away from Auston, Laine's shot is the best i've seen since OvieMatthews show that he have even better shot than Laine!!
Nobody has critisized him. That goal was awesome but for me, that first goal was sloppy defense from a two-way center.
Finally a poster who has good hockeyknowledge!It happens.
Chicago is my #2 team but even Toews gets beaten sometimes or has a brain fart, more often then not though he makes the smart play. The great thing I can see is that like Toews, more often then not Matthews is making the smart/right play, and as he gains experience etc, it'll help him improve as a player.
Remember, we're talking about Matthews and Laine like they are seasoned pros right now, reality is they are just 18.
Nobody has critisized him. That goal was awesome but for me, that first goal was sloppy defense from a two-way center.
Im not bashing him, but you have got to admit he didn't play that shift well (mainly because of the long shift)It wasn't sloppy defense, there was another guy wide open in a more dangerous spot who both Matthews and the dman went to cover. It was the correct decision by Matthews. Sometimes you make the right decision and still get beat, it's a fast game.
Finally a poster who has good hockeyknowledge!
Best top three we have had in a while!Thanks.
He just made a good place blocking ROR from making a play out front to a team mate for a tap in. So he's making the right play there.
Just need to enjoy this for what it is. Hockey is getting better, getting a whole new crop of talented young players.
Laine-Barkov-Pulj should be terrifying teams at Olympics etc for years to come
The U.S. whom I always thought was very average at centre is going to have a wicked 1-2 punch with Matthews and Eichel now.
Im not bashing him, but you have got to admit he didn't play that shift well (mainly because of the long shift)
Im not bashing him, but you have got to admit he didn't play that shift well (mainly because of the long shift)
Nobody has critisized him. That goal was awesome but for me, that first goal was sloppy defense from a two-way center.
Yeah. Being a strong two-way player doesn't mean you are perfect 100% of the time. So long as you are making a lot more strong defensive plays and coverage than you are mistakes then you are still a good two-way player.It happens.
Chicago is my #2 team but even Toews gets beaten sometimes or has a brain fart, more often then not though he makes the smart play. The great thing I can see is that like Toews, more often then not Matthews is making the smart/right play, and as he gains experience etc, it'll help him improve as a player.
Remember, we're talking about Matthews and Laine like they are seasoned pros right now, reality is they are just 18.
his line got hemmed in for like 2 minutes there, he did get caught puck watching though
Matthews got the puck up to him. He must have forgot that Foligno doesn't know how to use a hockey stick.Yep.
Earlier in the shift Foligno failed to get the puck out of the zone. Should have been a simple play. You could feel the goal coming after that.
I don't like to say anything about Laine's game because that thread is just pure cancer. And there's no need to be hostile just pointed that one thing out cause people were talking about it. They are two different kinds of players and both generational talents!Looking forward to your shift-by-shift critiques of Laine's play. *looks at post history* ...oh....I guess not.
Yeah. Being a strong two-way player doesn't mean you are perfect 100% of the time. So long as you are making a lot more strong defensive plays and coverage than you are mistakes then you are still a good two-way player.
And yeah are talking about 18-year olds in a tournament you almost never see them playing prominent roles in.
Anyways, has been fun watching Matthews and seeing what he can do. Only getting more confident as the tournament has gone along. Trusting more his own shooting and getting nice results offensively. Two-way play has been good the whole time I thought.
TSN Commentators just now:
"We're still trying to figure out what Matthews doesn't do well"
lol
Matthews got the puck up to him. He must have forgot that Foligno doesn't know how to use a hockey stick.
I think Matthews is much more dynamic but Barkov has better two-way gameHe is like Barkov, but with a better shot. That shot is elite for sure.
I think Matthews is much more dynamic but Barkov has better two-way game
Not really, Laine only shoots one timers. I think it bounced off Larkin but still an unbelievable shot nonetheless!Very laine-esque goal
Yea i think Matthews is pretty much a copy of Barkov, but with a bit better skating at the same ageSame age i'd say Barkov-Matthews 2-way game is very comparable and likely on par. We're just looking at Barkov today and he's obviously picked up a few years of NHL experience and would definitely be a better 2-way guy then Matthews right now due to age/experience.