Line Combos: Build a lineup poll #5: 2C

Who should be the team's 2C?

  • Cam Atkinson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Emil Bemstrom

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Liam Foudy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nathan Gerbe

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Boone Jenner

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Stefan Matteau

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ryan MacInnis

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Riley Nash

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Eric Robinson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kevin Stenlund

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    32
  • Poll closed .

Monk

Registered User
Feb 5, 2008
7,505
5,399
DSL Copy-Pasta:

So here is the (not) much-discussed lineup poll. Instead of Torts' slot machine line generator, we'll be voting for each spot on the roster, building each line one spot at a time. We started with 1LW, and will work our way through the forward lines and on to D pairs and starter and backup goalies.

This poll includes every forward reasonably expected to be available to the team whenever the season should start.

Vote for your choice for second line C, and the winner will be slotted there and removed from subsequent polls. Sure, there are some nuances such a process doesn't allow for - there will be times when you can't vote for who you'd like at a spot because they've already been slotted somewhere else, or there's a combo you like that gets nixed along the way. You can alter, or not, your subsequent voting accordingly.

Here's to the continuation of a new tradition!

Forward lines
Alexandre Texier - Pierre-Luc Dubois - Oliver Bjorkstrand
Nick Foligno - 2C - 2RW
 

Monk

Registered User
Feb 5, 2008
7,505
5,399
I thought there'd be a bit more competition for 2LW, but maybe a bunch of us have read the same "Domi thrives with a physical winger" stuff.

I'm expecting 2C to be a fairly decisive runaway, and then perhaps the real intrigue will start with 2RW.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cslebn

MoeBartoli

Checkers-to-Jackets
Jan 12, 2011
14,079
10,299
I thought there'd be a bit more competition for 2LW, but maybe a bunch of us have read the same "Domi thrives with a physical winger" stuff.

I'm expecting 2C to be a fairly decisive runaway, and then perhaps the real intrigue will start with 2RW.
Hmmm.....I’m thinking 2RW should be pretty straight forward.
 

Monk

Registered User
Feb 5, 2008
7,505
5,399
Hmmm.....I’m thinking 2RW should be pretty straight forward.

Well perhaps I'm in the minority on that front, but I'm torn between two and not leaning toward who you're probably thinking of :)
 

Monk

Registered User
Feb 5, 2008
7,505
5,399
To paraphrase Billy Shakesberg: "My kingdom for some intrigue!"

9ffc7a74-d4fa-4003-8693-c9f29e31197b_screenshot.jpg
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad